Tags

, , , , , , , ,

old paper or parchmentYou can’t put your guard down. Rest assured the wheels of ugly education reform continue to churn. Here is a recent Seattle Times headline,Special education is ineffective and too expensive, report says.”

Why? Well, students with special needs, 54 percent to be exact, aren’t managing to get their diplomas on time. They also aren’t going on to college as much as their non-disabled peers. They fail to always reach their No Child Left Behind (NCLB) goals on their Individualized Education Program (IEP). Students with emotional disabilities, I’m guessing with no real Special education (SpEd) services, are getting suspended 2 to 3 times more often than the students without disabilities. Second language students aren’t being served well, and parents have become concerned that their students won’t be employable.

I would argue that the reforms that have taken place since the reauthorizations that formed Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA), along with No Child Left Behind (NCLB) and Race to the Top (RTTT), have not been in the best interest of students with special needs across the country. The harsh budget cuts haven’t helped either.

But instead of fixing the problems, and without reassessing the terrible reforms that have been foisted on schools and students with disabilities for the last 20 years or more, this is what the rubber stamped Blue Ribbon Commission Report from the Governor’s office, came up with:

The evidence is clear that disabilities do not cause disparate outcomes, but that the system itself perpetuates limitations in expectations and false belief systems about who children with disabilities can be and how much they can achieve in their lifetime.

“System,” of course, implies teachers. Hey, you teachers quit sitting around painting your nails and raise those expectations! And while you are at it—embrace Common Core! Why doesn’t the news say what they all really mean?

And this is how the Seattle Times puts it:

But the vast majority of children in special education do not have disabilities that prevent them from tackling the same rigorous academic subjects as general education students if they get the proper support, so those low numbers reflect shortcomings in the system, not the students.

And where does this all come from? What revolutionary research study have we missed? Secretary of Education, Arne Duncan, and the U.S. Department of Education!

arne-duncan-poll1You see, with higher expectations, proper support and plenty of rigor, most if not all of the students with disabilities can achieve excellent results. And that is where the Common Core comes in: Rigor for all. No exceptions, no excuses.

 

 

 

 

 

 

Related:

Common Core Curriculum

Special education is ineffective and too expensive, report says

Seattle: Special Education

Seattle’s Demolition of Special Education: Making Way for …

Report Details Problems with Special Education

COMMON CORE | Education Without Representation

What Is an IEP? | Individualized Education Program

What Is IDEA? | Individuals with Disabilities Education Act

No Child Left Behind – ED.gov – US Department of Education

Race to the Top Fund – US Department of Education

Government Education: The Worst Mistake Ever Made In …

The Good, The Bad, The Ugly – Democrats for Education

The Art Of Education For Life | lisa’s leaks

Communitarian Education Agenda | lisa’s leaks

AFT: Obama Must Force Arne Duncan to ‘Improve’ or …

Peter Greene on Arne Duncan on Testing: There He Goes …

 

Advertisements