Islamic Holocaust: Western wars have killed AT LEAST 4 million Muslims


, , , , ,

Baghdad_bombing_IraqWaShock and awe… and death, lots of death.

Last month, the Washington DC-based Physicians for Social Responsibility (PRS) released a landmark study concluding that the death toll from 10 years of “War on Terror” since the 9/11 attacks is at least 1.3 million, and could be even high as 2 million.

The 97-page report by the Nobel Peace Prize-winning doctors’ group is the first to tally up the total number of civilian casualties from US-led counter-terrorism interventions in Iraq, Afghanistan and Pakistan.

The PSR report is authored by an interdisciplinary team of leading public health experts, including Dr. Robert Gould, director of health professional outreach and education at the University of California San Francisco (UCSF) Medical Center, and Professor Tim Takaro of the Faculty of Health Sciences at Simon Fraser University.

Yet it has been almost completely blacked out by the English-language media, despite being the first effort by a world-leading public health organization to produce a scientifically robust calculation of the number of people killed by the US-UK-led “war on terror.”

Mind the gaps

The PSR report is described by Dr Hans von Sponeck, former UN assistant secretary-general, as “a significant contribution to narrowing the gap between reliable estimates of victims of war, especially civilians in Iraq, Afghanistan and Pakistan and tendentious, manipulated or even fraudulent accounts.”

The report conducts a critical review of previous death toll estimates of “war on terror” casualties. It is heavily critical of the figure most widely cited by mainstream media as authoritative, namely, the Iraq Body Count (IBC) estimate of 110,000 dead. That figure is derived from collating media reports of civilian killings, but the PSR report identifies serious gaps and methodological problems in this approach.

IBCView database

For instance, although 40,000 corpses had been buried in Najaf since the launch of the war, IBC recorded only 1,354 deaths in Najaf for the same period. That example shows how wide the gap is between IBC’s Najaf figure and the actual death toll.

Such gaps are replete throughout IBC’s database. In another instance, IBC recorded just three airstrikes in a period in 2005, when the number of air attacks had in fact increased from 25 to 120 that year. Again, the gap here is by a factor of 40.

According to the Physicians for Social Responsibility (PRS) study, the much-disputed  Lancet study that estimated 655,000 Iraq deaths up to 2006 (and over a million until today by extrapolation) was likely to be far more accurate than IBC’s figures. In fact, the report confirms a virtual consensus among epidemiologists on the reliability of the Lancet study.

Despite some legitimate criticisms, the statistical methodology it applied is the universally recognized standard to determine deaths from conflict zones, used by international agencies and governments.

Politicized denial

PSR also reviewed the methodology and design of other studies showing a lower death toll, such as a paper in the New England Journal of Medicine, which had a range of serious limitations.

That paper ignored the areas subject to the heaviest violence, namely Baghdad, Anbar and Nineveh, relying on flawed IBC data to extrapolate for those regions. It also imposed “politically-motivated restrictions” on collection and analysis of the data – interviews were conducted by the Iraqi Ministry of Health, which was “totally dependent on the occupying power” and had refused to release data on Iraqi registered deaths under US pressure.

In particular, PSR assessed the claims of Michael Spaget, John Sloboda and others who questioned the Lancet study data collection methods as potentially fraudulent. All such claims, PSR found, were spurious.

PLOS study

The few “justified criticisms,” PSR concludes, “do not call into question the results of the Lancet surveys as a whole. These figures still represent the best estimates that are currently available”. The Lancet findings are also corroborated by the data from a new study in PLOS Medicine, finding 500,000 Iraqi deaths from the war. Overall, PSR concludes that the most likely number for the civilian death toll in Iraq since 2003 to date is about 1 million.

To this, the PSR study adds at least 220,000 in Afghanistan and 80,000 in Pakistan, killed as the direct or indirect consequence of US-led war: a “conservative” total of 1.3 million. The real figure could easily be “in excess of 2 million.”

Yet even the PSR study suffers from limitations. Firstly, the post-9/11 “war on terror” was not new, but merely extended previous interventionist policies in Iraq and Afghanistan.

Secondly, the huge paucity of data on Afghanistan meant the PSR study underestimated the Afghan death toll.


War on Terror2The war on Iraq did not begin in 2003, but in 1991 with the first Gulf War, which was followed by the UN sanctions regime.

An early PSR study by Beth Daponte, then a US government Census Bureau demographer, found that Iraq deaths caused by the direct and indirect impact of the first Gulf War amounted to around 200,000 Iraqis, mostly civilians. Meanwhile, her internal government study was suppressed.

After US-led forces pulled out, the war on Iraq continued in economic form through the US-UK imposed UN sanctions regime, on the pretext of denying Saddam Hussein the materials necessary to make weapons of mass destruction. Items banned from Iraq under this rationale included a vast number of items needed for everyday life.

Undisputed UN figures show that 1.7 million Iraqi civilians died due to the West’s brutal sanctions regime, half of whom were children.

muslims-lands-300x218The mass death was seemingly intended. Among items banned by the UN sanctions were chemicals and equipment essential for Iraq’s national water treatment system.

A secret US Defense Intelligence Agency (DIA) document discovered by Professor Thomas Nagy of the School of Business at George Washington University amounted, he said, to “an early blueprint for genocide against the people of Iraq.”

This document, which was partially declassified but unpublicized in 1995, can also be found on the Pentagon’s web site at (I disclosed this document before but the news media showed little interest in it. The only reporters I know of who wrote lengthy stories on it were Felicity Arbuthnot in the Sunday Herald of Scotland, who broke the story, and Charlie Reese of the Orlando Sentinel, who did a follow-up).

In his paper for the Association of Genocide Scholars at the University of Manitoba, Professor Nagi explained that the DIA document revealed “minute details of a fully workable method to ‘fully degrade the water treatment system’ of an entire nation” over a period of a decade. The sanctions policy would create “the conditions for widespread disease, including full scale epidemics,” thus “liquidating a significant portion of the population of Iraq.”

This means that in Iraq alone, the US-led war from 1991 to 2003 killed 1.9 million Iraqis; then from 2003 onward around 1 million: totaling just under 3 million Iraqis dead over two decades.


In Afghanistan, PSR’s estimate of overall casualties could also be very conservative. Six months after the 2001 bombing campaign, The Guardian‘s Jonathan Steele revealed that anywhere between 1,300 and 8,000 Afghans were killed directly, and as many as a further 50,000 people died avoidably as an indirect result of the war.

body countIn his book, Body Count. Global avoidable mortality since 1950, Professor Gideon Polya applied the same methodology used by United Nations Population Division annual mortality data to calculate plausible figures for excess deaths. A retired biochemist at La Trobe University, Melbourne, Polya concludes that total avoidable Afghan deaths since 2001 under ongoing war and occupation-imposed deprivation amount to around 3 million people, about 900,000 of whom are infants under five.

Although Professor Polya’s findings are not published in an academic journal, his 2007 Body Count study has been recommended by California State University sociologist Professor Jacqueline Carrigan as “a data-rich profile of the global mortality situation” in a review published by the Routledge journal, Socialism and Democracy.

As with Iraq, US intervention in Afghanistan began long before 9/11 in the form of covert military, logistical and financial aid to the Taliban from around 1992 onward. This US assistance propelled the Taliban’s violent conquest of nearly 90 percent of Afghan territory.

In a 2001 National Academy of Sciences report, Forced Migration and Mortality, leading epidemiologist Steven Hansch, a director of Relief International, noted that total excess mortality in Afghanistan due to the indirect impacts of war through the 1990s could be anywhere between 200,000 and 2 million. The Soviet Union, of course, also bore responsibility for its role in devastating civilian infrastructure, thus paving the way for these deaths.

The US bears ultimate responsibility for setting terrorists loose in the country in order to bait Russia into intervening.

Altogether, this suggests that the total Afghan death toll due to the direct and indirect impacts of US-led intervention since the early nineties until now could be as high 3-5 million.


According to the figures explored here, total deaths from Western interventions in Iraq and Afghanistan since the 1990s – from direct killings and the longer-term impact of war-imposed deprivation – likely constitute around 4 million (at least 2 million in Iraq from 1991-2003, plus 2 million or more from the “war on terror”), and could be as high as 6-8 million people when accounting for higher avoidable death estimates in Afghanistan.

Forced Migration and Mortality | The National Academies  of Sciences

Forced Migration and MortalitySuch figures might seem too high, but we will never know for sure. US and UK armed forces, as a matter of policy, refuse to keep track of the civilian death toll of military operationsthey are an irrelevant inconvenience.

Due to the severe lack of data in Iraq, almost complete non-existence of records in Afghanistan, and the indifference of Western governments to civilian deaths, it is literally impossible to determine the true extent of loss of life.

In the absence of even the possibility of corroboration, these figures provide plausible estimates based on applying standard statistical methodology to the best, if scarce, evidence available. They give an indication of the scale of the destruction, if not the precise detail.

Much of this death has been justified in the context of fighting tyranny and terrorism. Yet thanks to the silence of the wider media, most people have no idea of the true scale of protracted terror wrought in their name by US and UK tyranny in Iraq and Afghanistan.

Widening the focus to all Western interventions in the Muslim world, the death toll increases further. Summarizing the above findings… the upper toll for West-caused deaths in Afghanistan and Pakistan (since 1991) is actually 5 million, and the conservative estimate for deaths resulting from Western intervention in Iraq (since 1991) is 3 million (the upper toll is 4 million).

Then we should add in the death toll from the proxy war against Syria (thus far), which is at least 100,000. The death toll in Libya from NATO’s Blitzkrieg (followed by CIA-fueled civil war) is “officially” 40,000, but an independent fact-finding commission found it to be 660,000.

Then there have also been the smaller-scale invasions and occupations of Lebanon and Palestine, the invasions and occupations of Mali and other central African states, and the drone and proxy wars in Yemen and Somalia, each yielding anything from several hundreds of deaths to tens of thousands.

All told, we’re probably looking at around 10 million people across ‘the Muslim world’ (from North Africa to Afghanistan) killed – either directly slaughtered, or as a consequence of “military intervention” – by the Empire’s war machine since 1991.

If that isn’t a holocaust, what is it?

Iraq warAny figure below at least 10 million is FAR too low, just from the 1990s on-wards.

What about Yugoslavia, Libya, Panama and too many other countries to properly recall.

The beat goes on from 1776 actually, because the longest period during which the US has not waged war somewhere, was five years during the Great Depression.

I have no time for empires generally, but at least all others (that I know of) built stuff, whereas this one only destroys.






Iraq Body Count

Recent events 2015

Friday 2 October: 27 killed.

Mosul: 8 executed; 1 woman killed in coalition air strikes.
Baghdad: 4 by IEDs; 1 body.
Shirqat: 5 executed.
Qayyarah: 2 executed.
Madain: 2 by gunfire.
Yusufiya: 2 by IED.
Sulaimaniya: 1 by gunfire.
Kirkuk: 1 by IED.

Thursday 1 October: 18 killed

Baghdad: 5 by gunfire, IEDs; 1 body.
Hawija: 3 executed.
Taji: 5 by IED.
Shirqat: 2 by gunfire.
Mahmudiya: 1 by IED.
Yusufiya: 1 policeman by IED.


Iraq Digital Memorial announcedHonouring the dead in the eyes of the living Aug 2015War’s Moral ChaosRemembering the deadIraq 2014: Civilian deaths almost doubling year on yearThe language and actions of states and non-statesEarlier analysis from IBC…View the DatabaseAbout the IBC projectContribute to the work or make a donationReference: Resources, Announcements, Press releases

Physicians for Social Responsibility | PSR

Unworthy victims: Western wars have killed four million …

The Secret Behind the Sanctions: How the U.S. Intentionally …

Lancet surveys of Iraq War casualties

Shocking truth: How UK helped kill millions of civilians in …

Western wars have killed four million Muslims since 1990 …

the Pentagon | Tipping Point North South

From the Numbers :: Iraq Body Count

Analysis :: Iraq Body Count

National Academy of Sciences

The Weapons That Kill Civilians – Iraq Body Count

The War in Iraq: 10 years and counting

Will Tony Blair Be Hounded by War Crimes Accusations the …

Can Djibouti handle the proxy war in Yemen?

Scholarly articles for Lancet study on Physicians for Social Responsibility (PRS)

US Expands Its Drone War Into Somalia – The New York Times

Assessing Barack Obama’s Africa Policy: Suggestions for …

St. Pete for Peace – Obama fact sheet

Why Exactly Is the US at War in Yemen?


New York Times blames the victim; preaches to Palestinians about launching ‘intifadas’

Board of Directors | SF Bay PSR

Cutting the cord that feeds it: Islamic State short on cash while Russian planes back them into corner

War in Iraq: Not a Humanitarian Intervention | Human Rights …

Unique Facts about the Middle East: Persian Gulf War

As Russia begins bombing campaign, Israel claims to uncover ‘first suspected ISIS cell’

Genocide Studies and Indigenous Peoples

News | International Association of Genocide Scholars



2 thoughts on “Islamic Holocaust: Western wars have killed AT LEAST 4 million Muslims”

  1. Michael B. Young said:

    So,the United States does not play nice,ask the Japanese and Germans about our tender mercies!! I do understand that the Western Powers did force peoples that hated each other into Colonies, that was rather stupid,the United States did not have colonies in the Middle East!!


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s