, , , , , ,

Chemical and Biological WarfareThe original film titled Naval Concepts of Chemical and Biological Warfare (1952) was originally obtained through the USA Freedom Of Information Act (FOIA) by the Government-attic[1][2].

It is now an officially declassified naval video and in the public domain. Naval Concepts of Chemical and Biological Warfare (1952)  (see video below) discusses the US Navy’s offensive biological and chemical warfare tactics, capabilities and experiments in the early 1950’s, during the height of the cold war.

biological-weapons-convention-02-lgThe Laboratories, United States Army Biological Warfare Laboratories (USBWL) were a suite of research laboratories and pilot plant centers operating at Camp (later Fort Detrick), Maryland, USA, and all their projects were allegedly discontinued in 1969 when President Richard Nixon disestablished all offensive Biological Warfare studies and directed the destruction of all stock piles of these agents and munitions.

The narrator does not say what chemicals were used in these tests but clearly notes that the aerosol agents were replacements for biological and chemical weapons.

Contrary to rumors of “conspiracy theory,” the Department of Defense first published Chemtrails in 1990 as the title to a chemistry course for new pilots attending the esteemed US Air Force Academy. The term “Chemtrails,” and its implied meaning was eventually adopted by civilian observers to describe unusual jet contrail emissions.[5]

usaf_air-force-academy-chemtrails-manual-textDownload 28 MB “Chemtrails” 131 Manual – HERE or  HERE

This bio weapon technology has continued to be developed to this day in secret and has evolved greatly since 1952 and 1990 with many US patents leading to the USA Department Of Defense and its military industrial complex.

These technology’s are now known as Geoengineering, Aerosol Geoengineering, HAARP (High Frequency Active Auroral Research Program), and climate engineering, just to name a few.

People around the world are noticing that our planet’s weather is dramatically changing. They are also beginning to notice the long lingering trails left behind airplanes that have lead millions to accept the reality of chemtrail/geoengineering programs.

geoengineering to control weatherCould there be a connection between the trails and our severe weather? While there are many agendas associated with these damaging programs, evidence is now abundant which proves that geoengineering can be used to control weather.

In August 18, 2012, Michael J. Murphy released a ground breaking film exposing this crime called What in the World Are They Spraying? The multi award winning film’s success led to Michael J. Murphy’s second follow up multi award winning documentary called “Why in the World are They Spraying?” [6] that dove deeper in to the climate engineering rabbit hole, thus proving these Aerosol Geoengineering technologies have been going on in secret with the assistance governments all around the world for many decades.

WHY in the world are they sprayingBecause geoengineering changes our climate’s temperature, disrupts our natural weather events and causes a series of other events which mimic the consequences of climate change, we feel strongly that geoengineering must be stopped before proceeding with any climate talks, treaties and climate change legislation and mandates.[7]

Climate Change Legislation will, if passed, lead to global governance, the disintegration of nations (including the sovereignty of Native American Nations,) transfer trillions of dollars into the hands of a few at the expense of many and allow an unelected body Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) to intervene and micro manage our lives.

worldofgeoengineering_fullsizeIf these Laws and Treaties are passed and goes into effect, it will most likely lead to public propaganda campaigns to influence people’s support of the legalization of geoengineering.

Legalization will prevent lawsuits, establish global governance, and create clear and open financing to such programs which will make it exponentially more difficult to stop.[7]

Denied, yet ongoing geoengineering has not been included in any climate models, making it impossible to determine whether the planet is warming or cooling.[7] We therefore demand that global geoengineering programs be stopped before any more climate change talks and legislation is enacted.

Concepts of Chemical and Biological Warfare (1952)

Department of Defense Film Production, National Archives and Records Administration.

Release Date:Sept. 30, 2015. Film is featured full from 0:46 to 15:06


(EPA) operations and function




[3].https://en.wikipedia.org [4].https://en.wikipedia.org

Want sunshine? What Are You Doing To Help Save The World Today? (See Global March Against Chemtrails And Geoengineeringhttp://www.GMACAG.com) and Michael J. Murphy are Campaigning to Ban Climate Engineering Everywhere![6][7][8]




Geoengineering Watch | Exposing the climate engineering

US Department of Defense Releases List of All 300+ …

Excellent Interviews – Why in the World are they Spraying …

http://www.etcgroup.org/sites/www.etcgrou… – Australian ..

Scholarly articles for Climate change legislation

North America

Canadian flag

Mexican flag

Puerto Rico
United States flag
United States of America


Scholarly articles for legislation treaty global warming climate change

Climate and Energy Legislation

The International Climate Treaty and US Legislation

The Global Climate Change Regime – Council on Foreign …

Environmental Treaties and Resource Indicators (ENTRI)

United Nations Global Issues: Climate Change – the United …

Digging up the roots of the IPCC | Environment

The Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC)

The 2015 international agreement – European Commission

NRDC: Environmental Laws and Treaties

Global Warming Laws And Regulations (Global Warming)

111th Congress Climate Change Legislation

Legislation – California Climate Change

California’s Senate Passes Sweeping Climate Change …

Globalization and climate change – World Council of Churches

New Report: Globalization Partly to Blame for Climate Change

Van Hollen moving climate change with 2016 … – CNN.com

Joint Sessions – Third ISA Forum of Sociology, July 10-14, 201

Globalization 2016 – Leadership Digital

Stop the Globalization of California

NASA Proposes Spraying Stratospheric Aerosols Into Earth’s

CIA And NASA Back Proposals To Spray Aerosols Into …

Atmospheric Aerosols: What Are They, and Why Are … – Nasa

Global Weather Modification Assault Causing Climate …

NASA Expert: Chemtrails Are Real and Rogue

What are the health implications NASA project of spraying …

An overview of geoengineering of climate using stratospheric

Chemtrails, Aerosol Geoengineering and Bioengineering

Climate Change Laws of the World – Columbia Law School

H.R. 1275 – Congress.gov

H.R.1276 – 114th Congress (2015-2016): Coastal State ..

Climate change policy of the United States

Battle Royale: Looming EPA Regulations On Climate …

The Department of Defense, the Motion Picture Production …

Backed by the Pentagon – TV Tropes

One Man In The Department Of Defense Controls All Of …

DoD Instruction 5410.16, July 31, 2015 – Defense Technical ..

Records of the office of the Secretary of Defense

Department of Defense Film Production

The U.S. military’s Hollywood connection

The Paris Climate-Change Spectacular | ETC Group

A California germ warfare test revelation

list of defense department films – The Center for Programs in …

Department of Defense Documents – Governmentattic.org …

Governmentattic.org: Rummaging in the Governments attic


Internet Archive Search: subject:”chemical”

Video: Biowar Covertly Waged On US Citizens Since The 1950’s

Scholarly articles for legalization of geoengineering

Activist Warns About Climate Change Treaties And …

The legalization of geoengineering

Michael Murphy: Very Important! Geoengineering …

Class Action Lawsuit | Geoengineering Action Network

Whistleblower Activist Exposes Covert Agenda Behind …


Michael J. Murphy Interview: Chemtrails, Climate Change …

Air Force Academy “Chemtrails” Manual Available For …

Military Documents Confirm “Chemtrails” Originated in the …

Air Pollutants | Air and Radiation | US EPA

Patent EP2357483B1 – A method of subsynchronous …

Patent US4607217 – Subsynchronous resonance detection …

Tropical Storm Koppu – | Weather Underground

Scholarly articles for Concepts of Chemical and Biological Warfare (1952)

(FCC) Inspector General (OIG) investigations, 2013-2014

(EPA) operations and function – Governmentattic.org

Description of document: Records indicating the impact of federal budget
sequestration upon Environmental Protection Agency
(EPA) operations and functions, FY 2013
Request date: 2013
Released date: 13-June-2014
Posted date: 05-October-2015
Source of document: National Freedom of Information Officer
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW (2822T)
Washington, DC 20460
Federal FOIA Online
The governmentattic.org web site (“the site”) is noncommercial and free to the public. The site and materials
made available on the site, such as this file, are for reference only. The governmentattic.org web site and its
principals have made every effort to make this information as complete and as accurate as possible, however,
there may be mistakes and omissions, both typographical and in content. The governmentattic.org web site and
its principals shall have neither liability nor responsibility to any person or entity with respect to any loss or
damage caused, or alleged to have been caused, directly or indirectly, by the information provided on the
governmentattic.org web site or in this file. The public records published on the site were obtained from
government agencies using proper legal channels. Each document is identified as to the source. Any concerns
about the contents of the site should be directed to the agency originating the document in
question. GovernmentAttic.org is not responsible for the contents of documents published on the website.
JUN 1 3 [014
RE: FOIA Request Number:
Thank you for your inquiry on the impact that sequestration had on the U.S. Environmental
Protection Agency FY 2013 budget. A review of our records identifies the enclosed letter sent
to Senator Mikulski. The enclosure was sent to her office on February 6, 2013.
If you have any additional questions, please contact Daniel Gonzalez at 202-564-2877 or
Carol Terris, Acting Director
Office of Budget
Internet Address (URL) • http //www epa gov
Recycled/Recyclable • Pnnted with Vegetable Oil Based Inks on 100% Postconsumer Process Chlorine Free Recycled Paper
The Honorable Barbara A. Mikulski
Committee on Appropriations
United States Senate
Washington. D.C. 20510
Dear Madam Chairwoman:
FEB 0 6 2013
I am responding to your letter dated January 22, 2013, requesting information about the impact that
sequestration will have on the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency’s ability to protect the nation’s
environment and public health. As stewards of taxpayers· dollars. we have set priorities. made tough
choices and managed our budget carefully. Sequestration, however, will force us to make cuts we
believe will directly undercut our congressionally-mandated mission of ensuring Americans have clean
air, clean water and clean land. I am enclosing our preliminary assessment of some of the impacts of
sequestration, should it be implemented. Our assessment highlights a number of immediate impacts to
programs, people and services.
Should you have any questions about the information included. please have your staff contact Ed Walsh
of my staff at (202) 564-4594.
Lisa P. Jackson
Internet Address (URl.) • ‘l!Wl.’wwv•i epa gov
Recycl<Xl/Recyclable • Prmed with Vegetahll’ C:il 8.;sed Inks on 100% f”Mtconsu..,e’, Pmceso Ch!n~nr. !Oree Rilc.cled Paper
Potential Impacts of Sequestration
Air Programs
• ENERGY STAR is relied upon by millions of Americans and thousands of companies to save money
and protect the environment through energy efficient products and practices.
o Results are already adding up. Americans, with the help of ENERGY STAR, prevented 210 million
metric tons of GHG emissionsl in 2011 alone- equivalent to the annual emissions from 41
million vehicles-and reduced their utility bills by $23 billion.
• Under sequestration, there would be three specific impacts that could jeopardize, delay or impair
further progress: (1) EPA’s ability to keep ENERGY STAR product specifications up to date across
more than 65 categories would slow down, including electronics, appliances and home heating and
cooling systems; (2) EPA would have to reduce the number of energy-intensive industrial sectors it
works with to develop energy performance indicators and Energy Efficiency Guides; and (3) EPA
would reduce support for our Portfolio Manager, both the planned upgrade and our ability to
support its users, including the approximately 10 major cities and states as well as the federal
government, which use the tool in emissions and energy disclosure and benchmarking policies.
Vehicle Certification
• Before new vehicles can be sold in the United States, EPA must first certify that they are in
compliance with emissions standards.
• Sequestration would harm EPA’s ability to confirm in a timely manner that manufacturers are
complying with all vehicle emission standards and creates the risk that some manufacturers would
be delayed in their ability to certify their products. Without this certification, they would be unable
to sell these products in the United States, thus depriving car-buyers access to the latest vehicles
and potentially harming vehicle sales and the economy.
State Air Monitors
• Air quality monitoring is vital to the protection of public health from harmful air pollution.
• Sequestration would reduce the funding EPA provides states to monitor alr quality, likely forcing the
shutdown of some critical air monitoring sites. Lost monitoring for high priority pollutants such as
ozone and fine particles would impact the collection of data necessary for determining whether
areas of the country meet, or do not meet, the Clean Air Act’s health-based standards.
• Sequestration would force the Agency to eliminate or significantly reduce essential air quality data
systems like AIRNow, a popular air quality reporting and forecasting system. Americans that have or
care for individuals with respiratory and cardiac health issues rely on AIRNow for information about
when to take action to avoid health impacts from air pollution. The Agency would eliminate
upgrades for the Emission Inventory and Air Quality Systems – the Agency would only fund
operations for these systems. These systems store and process air quality monitoring and emissions
data from across the nation that informs EPA, state, tribal, and local air agencies’ decisions on steps
needed to improve air quality. Without this monitoring data, future improvements in air quality
would be hampered or delayed.
Potential Impacts of Sequestration
Enforcement and Compliance Programs
Civil and Criminal Enforcement
Americans expect their government to protect them from violations of the nation’s environmental laws
that could harm their families and impact the safety and prosperity of their communities.
Sequestration’s reduction to EPA’s enforcement budget would:

Reduce EPA’s ability to monitor compliance with environmental laws – as fewer environmental cops
are on the “beat” to enforce environmental laws (note implementation of the sequester could result
in 1,000 fewer inspections in FY 2013.)
Limit EPA’s capacity to identify toxic air emissions, water discharges, and other sources of pollution
that directly affect public health and the environment.
National Environmental Policy Act
• EPA’s comments on environmental reviews are required by law and help to ensure that federal
agencies understand the potential environmental impacts and have considered alternatives to
proposed projects on federal lands. Sequestration would reduce support for environmental reviews
and could slow the approval of transportation and energy related projects.
Superfund Enforcement
Superfund enforcement ensures that responsible parties pay for necessary and often costly cleanups at
the nation’s most polluted sites. Sequestration would cut work to press responsible parties to clean up
contaminated sites in communities and restore clean up funds for use at other sites – putting the costs
back on the American public. (note: estimated $100 million loss in clean-up commitments and cost
reimbursements to the government).
Tribal Programs
EPA tribal funding supports environmental protection for 566 tribes on 70 million acres of tribal lands.
This funding includes the most significant grant resources to help tribal governments build the core
capacity necessary to protect public health and the environment. Funds are used to support staffing of
environmental directors and technicians to implement environmental projects, including safe drinking
water programs and development of solid waste management plans. Reduced funds under
sequestration would directly impact some of the country’s most economically disadvantaged
communities, resulting in loss of employment, and hindering tribal governments’ ability to ensure clean
air and clean and safe water.
Research and Development Programs
Air. Climate and Energy
• Under sequestration, cuts to EPA climate research would limit the ability of local, state and the
federal government to help communities adapt to and prepare for certain effects of climate change,
such as severe weather events. Without information provided by climate research, local

Potential Impacts of Sequestration
governments would not know how climate change would affect water quality, and therefore would
be unable to develop adaptation strategies to maintain protection of water quality as the climate
Implementation of the sequester would eliminate research to increase our understanding of
exposures and health effects of air pollutants on susceptible and vulnerable populations, such as
asthmatics, the growing aging population, and individuals living near air pollution sources which
would impact the development of national air quality standards as required by the Clean Air Act.
Chemical Safety for Sustainability
• Under sequestration, the reduction in funding would impede EPA’s ability to assess and understand
the effect of nanomaterials on human health and dispose of rare earth materials used in electronics,
thereby limiting innovation and manufacturing opportunities with these materials in the US. The
reduction in funding for endocrine disrupting chemicals research would limit our nation’s ability to
determine where and how susceptible people are exposed to endocrine disrupting chemicals, and to
understand how these toxic exposures impact their health and welfare. Limiting the use of advanced
chemical evaluation approaches recommended by the National Academy of Sciences would impair
the ability of business, states and EPA to make decisions on both the safety of existing industrial
chemicals, as well as on the development and use of safer chemicals.
Sustainable & Healthy Communities

Under sequestration EPA would reduce the number of undergraduate and graduate fellowships
(STAR and GRO) by approximately 45, thus eliminating any new fellowships. The Fellowship
program, one of the most successful fellowship programs in government, is educating the next
generation of environmental scientists, which is critical to a strong and competitive economy.
Reductions under Sequestration would discontinue funding for two joint EPA/National Institutes of
Health Centers of Excellence for Children’s Health Research. These centers are providing a greater
understanding of how the environment impacts today’s most pressing children’s health challenges,
including asthma, autism, attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD), neurodevelopmental
deficits, childhood leukemia, diabetes, and obesity. Eliminating funding would negatively impact
graduate students and faculty who would have to look for new funding to keep their research going
and ultimately slow down the pace of scientific research in these important areas. Research in these
areas translates to improved public health.
EPA research and grants to academic institutions for studies to understand human health disparities
at the community-level would both be severely curtailed by reductions under sequestration. This
would be especially significant to disproportionately affected communities across the US. Important
research would be stopped mid-stream and graduate students would be without expected funding.
This would delay scientific research in these fields, which are important to advancing public health.
Safe and Sustainable Water Resources

Under sequestration Reductions to green infrastructure (GI) research would slow the Agency’s
ability to provide GI best-management practices to municipalities dealing with costly storm water
enforcement actions. Other benefits of GI, such as wildlife habitat, flood and erosion control,
recreational opportunities, jobs and increased property values, would also be Jost.
Sequestration would cut research to find cleaner and cheaper solutions to help states and cities
address the nation’s crumbling water infrastructure that is contaminating clean drinking water and
Potential Impacts of Sequestration
causing substantial loss of valuable quantities of water.
Human Health Risk Assessment

Reductions under Sequestration would result in the significant delay of crucial Integrated Risk
Information System (IRIS) human health related assessments (e.g. arsenic, styrene, ethylbenzene,
naphthalene and manganese) that would limit the ability of EPA and states to make decisions to
protect people’s health.
Sequestration reductions delaying the delivery of four major Integrated Science Assessments would
limit the ability of EPA to make decisions that would protect people from certain air pollutants.
Homeland Security Research

Sequestration would stall development of approaches to manage waste from radiological
contaminants following a terrorist attack or a nuclear accident. Opportunities to learn lessons from
the Japanese Fukushima Disaster would be lost.
Under sequestration, reductions in practical research on preparedness following disasters would
inhibit the development of techniques and procedures for communities to prepare for and recover
from natural disasters and industrial accidents (e.g., Deepwater Horizon, Superstorm Sandy). This
would lead to longer recovery times and higher costs at the local, state, and national levels.
Water Programs
State Revolving Fund Program (SRFs):
• Under sequestration, cuts to Clean Water and Drinking Water SRFs would deprive communities from
access to funding to build or repair decaying water and wastewater infrastructure that provides safe
drinking water and removes and treats sewage.
Water Program State Implementation Grants:
• Reductions under sequestration would impact states’ ability to meet drinking water public health
standards and to reduce the nitrogen and phosphorus pollution that contaminate drinking water
supplies, cause toxic algae blooms, and deprive waters of oxygen that fish need to survive. This
reduction would result in the elimination of more than 100 water quality protection and restoration
projects throughout the United States. Examples of specific projects that would be impacted
include but are not limited to:
o Assisting small and/or disadvantaged public drinking water systems that need assistance to
improve the safety of the drinking water delivered to communities.
o Protecting children from harmful exposure to lead in drinking water by revising the Lead and
Copper Rule
o Protecting public health from cancer-causing Volatile Organic Compounds in drinking water
EPA ‘s Water Program Implementation:
• Reductions under sequestration would limit assistance provided to states and tribes to ensure safe
and clean water, including protecting children from exposure to lead in drinking water; protecting
rivers and streams from industrial and municipal pollution discharges, identifying and developing
Potential Impacts of Sequestration
cleanup plans for polluted waterways, and developing science to support human health and aquatic
Superstorm Sandy Appropriation:
• Sequestration would reduce funding available to enhance resiliency and reduce flood damage risk
and vulnerability at treatment works in communities impacted by Superstorm Sandy.
Community Protection Reduced
The Agency’s cleanup programs protect communities from the risks posed by hazardous waste sites and
releases and returns formally contaminated properties to beneficial use.

The Superfund Remedial program would be unable to fund an estimated 3-5 new construction
projects to protect the American public at Superfund National Priority List sites due to constrained
funding from the sequestration.
Under sequestration, the Agency may have to stop work at one or more ongoing Superfund
Remedial construction projects. Stopping any ongoing work would increase costs in the long run
(due to contract termination penalties and the need to demobilize and re-mobilize construction
The sequestration would reduce funding available for other parts of the Superfund Remedial
program as well. Critical steps leading up to construction would be curtailed.
Cuts to the Brownfield Program’s budget under sequestration would limit the Agency’s ability to
provide cleanup, job training, and technical assistance to brownfield communities. The Program
leverages nearly $17 dollars of private and public sector funding for every dollar expended by the
Brownfields program to clean up sites and help revitalize communities and support economic
Under sequestration, funding cuts would reduce Risk Management Plan (RMP) Program inspections
and prevention activities. Both high-risk and non high-risk RMP facility inspections would be
reduced by approximately 26 inspections per year, from 500 to 474. Of the reduced inspections,
approximately 8 would be from high risk facilities and the RMP inspector training program would be
Cuts to the Oil Spill program under sequestration would reduce protection of US waters from oil
spills by reducing inspection and prevention activities. The largest program impact of an oil budget
reduction would be on inspections at regulated facilities. EPA currently conducts approximately 840
inspections per year at SPCC-regulated facilities (which represents 0.13 % of the total universe of
640,000) and 290 FRP inspections/ unannounced exercises (about 6.5% of the universe of 4,400).
EPA would reduce approximately 37 FRP inspections in FY 2013 and limit the development of a third
party audit program for SPCC facilities, which may lead to a decrease in compliance with
environmental and health regulations.
EPA I State Cleanup and Waste Program Cuts

Under sequestration state cleanup program funding would be cut reducing site assessments .
Cuts in Leaking Underground Storage Tank state grants under sequestration would result in nearly
290 fewer cleanups completed at contaminated sites, limiting further reductions to the backlog of
sites awaiting cleanup. It would reduce the number of sites and acres ready for reuse or continued

Potential Impacts of Sequestration
use, and therefore, fewer communities would receive the redevelopment benefit of cleaning up
LUST sites.
Under sequestration, cuts in state grants would result in approximately 2,600 fewer inspections, and
would limit the States’ ability to meet the statutory mandatory 3-year inspection requirement.
Decreased frequency of inspections may lead to a decline in compliance rates and could result in
more UST releases.
Since 75% of state clean up grants and 80% of state prevention grants support state staff, these cuts
under sequestration could lead to the loss of state jobs.
Under sequestration, cuts to the Brownfield Program would reduce funds to states and tribes for
the development of voluntary response programs.
A cut of $2.5 million to CERCLA 128(a) State and Tribal response program Brownfields categorical
grants program under sequestration would reduce the ability to fund new grantees (7 tribal
grantees) without further reducing the allocations of existing grantees, and would decrease the
number of properties that could be overseen by Voluntary Cleanup Programs by nearly 600.
Cuts under sequestration would delay work on a three-year project to develop a fee-based system
for managing hazardous waste transport (e-Manifest) that would produce the estimated $77 million
to $126 million in annual projected savings to industry and the states.
Sequestration cuts would reduce funding for maintenance to the only national system for tracking
state and federal RCRA permitting and corrective action. RCRA Info is vital to the U.S. economy since
it enables states to prioritize and implement their haiardous waste programs by tracking facility
activities regarding the handling hazardous waste (generators, or treatment, storage, or disposal

(FCC) Inspector General (OIG) investigations, 2013-2014

(EPA) operations and function – Governmentattic.org

Governmentattic.org: Rummaging in the Governments attic

Newly added files listings/links:
NEW Department of Homeland Security (DHS) reports produced by or for the Directorate for National Protection and Programs (DNPP) on the risks of geomagnetic storms to the nation, 2012-2013 – [PDF 12.6 MB 19-Oct-2015]

NEW Department of Commerce (DOC) Office of Inspector General (OIG) Office of Investigations Guide to Conducting Administrative Inquiries, 2012 – [PDF 4.6 MB 19-Oct-2015]

NEW FOIA Logs for the Bureau of Ocean Energy Management (BOEM), 2012-2015 – [PDF 1.1 MB 19-Oct-2015]

NEW Listing of Data Fields in the Bureau of Ocean Energy Management (BOEM) Shipwreck Databases, 2015 – [PDF 1.1 MB 19-Oct-2015]

NEW Bureau of Ocean Energy Management (BOEM) Records Retention Schedule, 2012-2015 – [PDF 4.6 MB 19-Oct-2015]

NEW Bureau of Ocean Energy Management (BOEM) Communications Plan 2014 – [PDF 1.7 MB 19-Oct-2015]

NEW Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) Veterans Health Administration (VHA) Office of Research Oversight (ORO) Annual Reports of Activities, 2012-2014 – [PDF 14.9 MB 19-Oct-2015]

NEW Naval Concepts of Chemical and Biological Warfare. Department of Defense (DoD) Film, 1952 – [12-Oct-2015]

Governmentattic.org cover sheet – [PDF 236 KB 12-Oct-2015]

MP4 file of film, 14.47 minutes – [MP4 238 MB 12-Oct-2015]
NOTE: Very large file: 238 MB

UPDATED Records Provided by Federal Agencies to Chairman Darrell Issa on the Administration of FOIA, 2011 – [12-Oct-2015]

New material added from the Department of Energy (DOE), Department of Health & Human Services (HHS), Office of Government Ethics (OGE), and Federal Election Commission (FEC)

NOTE: This link opens a separate page listing available files from 61 Federal agencies.

UPDATED Closing Documents for 30 National Reconnaissance Office (NRO) Inspector General (OIG) Investigations, 2011-2012 – [PDF 3.9 MB 12-Oct-2015]

NEW Closing documents for 30 Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) Inspector General (OIG) investigations, 2013-2014 – [PDF 9.6 MB 12-Oct-2015]

NEW Central Intelligence Agency: (CIA) history: National Photographic Interpretation Center: The Years of Project HTAUTOMAT, 1956-1958, 6 Volumes, Directorate of Science and Technology Historical Services, NPIC-3, 1974 – [PDF18.3 MB 05-Oct-2015]

NEW Records indicating the impact of federal budget sequestration upon Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) operations and functions, FY 2013 – [PDF 540 KB 05-Oct-2015]

NEW Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) National Security Information Handbook, January 2012 – [PDF 1.2 MB 05-Oct-2015]

NEW List of Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Office of Inspector General (OIG) investigations closed during CY 2012 – [PDF 2.3 MB 05-Oct-2015]

NEW List of Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Office of Inspector General (OIG) investigations closed during CY 2013 – [PDF 2.6 MB 05-Oct-2015]

UPDATED Copies of responses to Congressional Committees from the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) January 2012 – April 2013 – [PDF 8.2 MB 05-Oct-2015]

NEW Closing documents for 17 Department of the Interior (DOI) Inspector General (OIG) investigations, 2009-2012 – [PDF 3 MB 05-Oct-2015]

NEW Various materials relating to the Defense Intelligence Agency (DIA) Scientific Advisory Board (SAB), including Reports, Meeting Minutes and Committee Memoranda, 1966-2002 – [PDF 40 MB 28-Sep-2015]

NEW Department of Commerce (DOC) Inspector General (OIG) investigations closed during calendar year 2014 – [PDF 860 KB 28-Sep-2015]

NEW Department of Commerce (DOC) Office of the Inspector General (OIG) Weekly Activity Reports, January 2011 – June 2014 – [PDF 2 MB 28-Sep-2015]

NEW US Department of Agriculture (USDA) Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service (APHIS) Plant Pest and Disease Management and Disaster Prevention Report to Congress for Fiscal Years 2011-2013 – [PDF 800 KB 28-Sep-2015]

UPDATED Records related to US Navy Inspector General (OIG) investigations into senior misconduct at Navy, 2012-2013 – [PDF 3.8 MB 28-Sep-2015]

NEW US Army Center of Military History (CMH) Military History Coordinating Committee (MHCC) meeting minutes, 2001-2003, 2010 – [PDF 310 KB 28-Sep-2015]

NEW Informal complaints received by the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) which include the word “Football,” 2012-2015 – [PDF 3.7 MB 21-Sep-2015]

NEW Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) Communication Plan: NRC Staff Recommendation for the Disposition of Recommendation 1 of the Fukushima Near-Term Task Force Report, 2013 – [PDF 1.2 MB 21-Sep-2015]

NEW Scoping Paper for a Comprehensive Review of the Nuclear Regulatory Commission’s (NRC) Safeguards and Security Programs in Light of the Terrorist Attacks on September 11, 2001 – [PDF 3 MB 21-Sep-2015]

NEW National Credit Union Administration (NCUA) response to November 9, 2011 letter from Senator Tim Johnson, Chairman of the Senate Committee on Banking, Housing and Urban Affairs, asking questions on the regulation of financial institutions – [PDF 644 KB 21-Sep-2015]

NEW Closing documents from ten National Credit Union Administration (NCUA) Inspector General (OIG) investigations, 2010-2011 – [PDF 3.8 MB 21-Sep-2015]

NEW Department of State “Red Book” published by the Bureau of Intelligence and Research (INR), 2008 – [PDF 612 KB 21-Sep-2015]

NEW Statement of Work for the grant/contract let by the Department of Justice (DOJ) Office of Justice Programs (OJP), for the National Institute of Justice, to Interdisciplinary Scientific Research, 2003-2005 – [PDF 1.3 MB 21-Sep-2015]

NEW Two Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory (LLNL) reports re Biological Select Agents and Toxins Risk/Threat Assessment and Security, 2005, 2006 – [PDF 5.1 MB 14-Sep-2015]

NEW Records re: Tobacco Sales by the Defense Commissary Agency (DeCA), 2006-2012 – [PDF 2.9 MB 14-Sep-2015]

NEW Lists of closed investigations and audits performed by the Defense Commissary Agency (DeCA) Office of Inspector General (OIG), 2008-2012 – [PDF 190 KB 14-Sep-2015]

NEW Department of Homeland Security (DHS) Weekly Cabinet Reports produced through the Office of the Secretary, January 20 – April 30, 2009 – [PDF 3.6 MB 14-Sep-2015]

NEW Department of Homeland Security (DHS) Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) Weekly Reports. 2009-2011 – [PDF 7.3 MB 14-Sep-2015]

NEW Closing documents for 22 Federal Communications Commission (FCC) Inspector General (OIG) investigations, 2013-2014 – [PDF 4.9 MB 14-Sep-2015]

NEW Defense Logistics Agency (DLA) Accountability Office Listing of Accountability Audit Reports, 2011-2013 – [PDF 370 KB 14-Sep-2015]

NEW Department of Commerce (DOC) Office of the Inspector General (OIG) unpublished reports, 1998-2007 – [PDF 20 MB 07-Sep-2015]

NEW List of Department of the Interior (DOI) Office of the Inspector General (OIG) investigations closed, CY 2014 – [PDF 1.5 MB 07-Sep-2015]

NEW Table of Contents for the Federal Mediation and Conciliation Service (FMCS) Directives Manual, 2014 – [PDF 272 KB 07-Sep-2015]

NEW Selected Federal Mediation and Conciliation Service (FMCS) Directives, 2014 (1997-2011) – [PDF 1.4 MB 07-Sep-2015]

NEW Written responses or letters from the General Services Administration (GSA) to a Congressional Committee, 2012 – [PDF 1.1 MB 07-Sep-2015]

NEW Information Regarding Correspondence to/from the Producers of the Spike TV Television Series “DEA” and any DEA Memos Concerning Liaison with the Producers, 2007-2009 – [PDF 3.8 MB 07-Sep-2015]

NEW List of Department of Justice (DOJ) Office of the Inspector General (OIG) investigations closed, CY 2014 – [PDF 1.1 MB 07-Sep-2015]

NEW Closing documents for Nine Department of the Interior Office of Inspector General (OIG) Investigations, 2011-2012 – [PDF 1.6 MB 31-Aug-2015]

NEW Closing documents for Eight Department of the Interior Office of Inspector General (OIG) Investigations, 2011-2013 – [PDF 4.8 MB 31-Aug-2015]

NEW Closing documents for Two Department of the Interior Office of Inspector General (OIG) Investigations involving allegations regarding public corruption in the U.S. Territory of American Samoa, 2010 – [PDF 1.8 MB 31-Aug-2015]

NEW Report of Investigation for Department of the Interior Office of Inspector General (OIG) Investigation PI-PI-11-0312-I regarding alleged improprieties regarding report on the Deep Water Horizon (DWH) Blowout Preventer (BOP), 2011 – [PDF 1.9 MB 31-Aug-2015]

NEW National Geospatial-Intelligence Agency (NGA) Inspector General (OIG) Investigations Closed CY 2014 – [PDF 220 KB 31-Aug-2015]

NEW National Geospatial-Intelligence Agency (NGA) Inspector General (OIG) Investigations Closed CY 2013 – [PDF 212 KB 31-Aug-2015]

NEW Informal complaints received by the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) regarding the television shows ‘Here Comes Honey Boo Boo,’ and ‘19 Kids And Counting,’ 2012-2015 – [PDF 900 KB 31-Aug-2015]

NEW All semi-annual progress reports from grantees in the National Digital Newspaper Program (NDNP), 2014-2015 and National Digital Newspaper Program Impact Study 2004-2014, September 2014, released by the National Endowment for the Humanities (NEH) – [PDF 57 MB 24-Aug-2015]
NOTE: This is a large file; 57 Megabytes

NEW List of National Credit Union Administration (NCUA) Inspector General (OIG) Investigations Closed during CY 2013 – [PDF 570 KB 24-Aug-2015]

NEW FOIA case log for the National Credit Union Administration (NCUA) CY 2012-2013 – [PDF 1.3 MB 24-Aug-2015]

NEW Each response to a Question for the Record (QFR) provided to Congress by the National Credit Union Administration (NCUA), 2012-2014 – [PDF 690 KB 24-Aug-2015]

NEW Written responses or letters from the National Credit Union Administration (NCUA) to a Congressional Committee, 2012-2013 – [PDF 2 MB 24-Aug-2015]

NEW List of Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) Inspector General (OIG) Investigations Closed during CY 2013 – [PDF 3.7 MB 24-Aug-2015]

NEW Weekly reports summarizing the activities of the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) Inspector General (OIG) Office of Investigations, 2013-2014 – [PDF 3 MB 24-Aug-2015]