The alleged Syrian attack, which U.S. official’s say warrants a decisive military response from the West, would dash hopes that the world would never again see the large-scale use of chemical weapons, a prospect that had appeared increasingly realistic in recent years as all but a handful of nations signed a treaty agreeing to destroy their stockpiles.
The U.S. conducted an extensive nuclear testing program. 1,054 tests were conducted between 1945 and 1992. The exact number of nuclear devices detonated is unclear because some tests involved multiple devices while a few failed to explode or were designed not to create a nuclear explosion. The last nuclear test by the United States was on September 23, 1992; the U.S. has signed but not ratified the Comprehensive Test Ban Treaty.
In the early 1990s, the U.S. stopped developing new nuclear weapons and now devotes most of its nuclear efforts into stockpile stewardship, maintaining and dismantling its now-aging arsenal. The administration of George W. Bush decided in 2003 to engage in research towards a new generation of small nuclear weapons, especially “earth penetrators” . The budget passed by the United States Congress in 2004 eliminated funding for some of this research including the “bunker-busting or earth-penetrating” weapons.
The exact number of nuclear weapons possessed by the United States is difficult to determine. Different treaties and organizations have different criteria for reporting nuclear weapons, especially those held in reserve, and those being dismantled or rebuilt:
·As of 1999, the U.S. was said to have 12,000 nuclear weapons of all types stockpiled.
·For 2007, the Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists listed the U.S. with about 5,400 total nuclear warheads: around 3,575 strategic and 500 nonstrategic warheads; and about 1,260 additional warheads held in the inactive stockpile. Other warheads are in some step of the disassembly process.
·The exact number as of Sept. 30, 2009, was 5,113 warheads, according to a U.S. fact sheet released May 3, 2010.
In 2002, the United States and Russia agreed in the SORT treaty to reduce their deployed stockpiles to not more than 2,200 warheads each. In 2003, the US rejected Russian proposals to further reduce both nation’s nuclear stockpiles to 1,500 each. In 2007, for the first time in 15 years, the United States built some new warheads. These were to replace some older warheads as part of the Minuteman III upgrade program. 2007 also saw the first Minuteman III missiles removed from service as part of the drawdown. Overall, stockpiles and deployment systems continue to decline in number under the terms of the New START treaty.
Allegations: According to a compliance report published by the Russian government in August 2010, the U.S. is undertaking research on Smallpox which is prohibited by the World Health Organization.
The U.S. is also accused of undertaking BW research in order to improve defenses against bio-terror attacks which is “especially questionable from the standpoint of Article I of the Biological and Toxin Weapons Convention.”
Any other information: In May 2012, the second of the controversial H5N1 avian flu papers was published. The US National Science Advisory Board for Biosecurity advised against publishing due to concerns that the dual-use research would be used in biowarfare.
The Russian report also alleges that the U.S. has legislation which could inhibit inspections and investigations of U.S. chemical facilities.
Russia has also accused the U.S. of not fully reporting chemical agents removed from Iraq between 2003 and 2008 to the U.S. for testing and subsequent destruction.
In 2010, The Pentagon disclosed that the current size of its nuclear arsenal is a total of 5,113 warheads operationally deployed, kept in active reserve and held in inactive storage. The figure does not include the estimated 4,600 warheads that have been retired and scheduled for dismantlement. The number of operationally deployed strategic warheads stands at 1,968.
The US Air Force currently operates 450 ICBMs, located primarily in the northern Rocky Mountain states and the Dakotas. These are all of the Minuteman III ICBM variants. Peacekeeper missiles were phased out of the Air Force inventory in 2005. All USAF Minuteman II missiles have been destroyed in accordance with the START treaty and their launch silos imploded and buried then sold to the public. To comply with the START II most US multiple independently targetable reentry vehicles, or MIRVs, have been eliminated and replaced with single warhead missiles. However, since the abandonment of the START II treaty, the U.S. is said to be considering retaining 500 warheads on 450 missiles. The U.S. goal under the SORT treaty is to reduce from 1,600 warheads deployed on over 500 missiles in 2003 to 500 warheads on 450 missiles in 2012. The first Minuteman III were removed under this plan in 2007 while, at the same time, the warheads deployed on Minuteman IIIs began to be upgraded from smaller W62s to larger W87s from decommissioned Peacekeeper missiles.
The US Air Force also operates a strategic nuclear bomber fleet. The bomber force consists of 94 B-52 Stratofortresses, and 19 B-2 Spirits. All 64 B-1s were retrofitted to operate in a solely conventional mode by 2007 and are no longer counted as nuclear platforms.
The United States offensive biological weapons program was instigated by President Franklin Roosevelt and the U.S. Secretary of War in October 1941. Research occurred at several sites. A production facility was built at Terre Haute, Indiana but testing with a benign agent demonstrated contamination of the facility so no production occurred during World War II. A more advanced production facility was constructed in Pine Bluff, Arkansas, which began producing biological agents in 1954. Fort Detrick, Maryland later became a production facility as well as a research site. The U.S. developed anti-personnel and anti-crop biological weapons. Several deployment systems were developed including aerial spray tanks, aerosol spray canisters, grenades, rocket warheads and cluster bombs. (See also US Biological Weapon Testing)
In mid-1969, the UK and the Warsaw Pact, separately, introduced proposals to the UN to ban biological weapons, which would lead to a treaty in 1972. The U.S. cancelled its offensive biological weapons program by executive order in November 1969 (microorganisms) and February 1970 (toxins) and ordered the destruction of all offensive biological weapons, which occurred between May 1971 and February 1973. The U.S. ratified the Geneva Protocol on January 22, 1975. The U.S. ratified the Biological Weapons Convention (BWC) which came into effect in March 1975.[Kissinger 1969]
Negotiations for a legally binding verification protocol to the BWC proceeded for years. In 2001, negotiations ended when the Bush administration rejected an effort by other signatories to create a protocol for verification, arguing that it could be abused to interfere with legitimate biological research.
The U.S. had participated in the formulations of the Hague Conventions of 1899 and 1907 which banned chemical warfare among other things but the U.S. never joined the article which prohibited chemical weapons.
In World War I, the U.S. produced its own munitions as well as deploying weapons produced by the French. The U.S. produced 5,770 metric tons of these weapons, including 1,400 metric tons of phosgene and 175 metric tons of mustard gas. This was about 4% of the total chemical weapons produced for that war and only just over 1% of the era’s most effective weapon, mustard gas. (U.S. troops suffered less than 6% of gas casualties.)
After the war, the U.S. was party to the Washington Arms Conference Treaty of 1922 which would have banned chemical weapons but failed because it was rejected by France. The U.S. continued to stockpile chemical weapons, eventually exceeding 30,000 tons of material.
Chemical weapons were not used by the U.S. or the other Allies, during World War II; however, quantities of such weapons were deployed to Europe for use in case Germany initiated chemical warfare. At least one accident occurred: On the night of December 2, 1943, German Junkers Ju 88 bombers attacked the port of Bari in Southern Italy, sinking several American ships – among them John Harvey, which was carrying mustard gas. The presence of the gas was highly classified, and authorities ashore had no knowledge of it – which increased the number of fatalities, since physicians, who had no idea that they were dealing with the effects of mustard gas, prescribed treatment not consistent with those suffering from exposure and immersion. According to the U.S. military account, “Sixty-nine deaths were attributed in whole or in part to the mustard gas, most of them American merchant seamen” out of 628 mustard gas military casualties.[Navy 2006][Niderost] Civilian casualties were not recorded. The whole affair was kept secret at the time and for many years after the war.
After the war, the Allies recovered German artillery shells containing three new nerve agents developed by the Germans (Tabun, Sarin, and Soman), prompting further research into nerve agents by all of the former Allies. Thousands of American soldiers were exposed to warfare agents during Cold War testing programs as well as in accidents. In 1968, one such accident killed approximately 6,400 sheep when an agent drifted out of Dugway Proving Ground during a test.
The U.S. also investigated a wide range of possible nonlethal, psychobehavioral chemical incapacitating agents including psychedelicindoles such as lysergic acid diethylamide(experimented to see if it could be used for effective mind control) and marijuana derivatives, certain tranquilizers like ketamine or fentanyl, as well as several glycolate anticholinergics. One of the anticholinergic compounds, 3-quinuclidinyl benzilate, was assigned the NATO code BZ and was weaponized at the beginning of the 1960s for possible battlefield use. This agent was allegedly employed by American troops as a counterinsurgency weapon in the Vietnam War but the U.S. maintains that this agent never saw operational use. The North Koreans and Chinese have alleged that chemical and biological weapons were used by the United States in the Korean War; but, the United States denial is supported by Russian archival documents.
On November 25, 1969, President Richard Nixon unilaterally renounced the first use of chemical weapons and renounced all methods of biological warfare. He issued a unilateral decree halting production and transport of chemical weapons which remains in effect. From 1967 to 1970 in Operation CHASE, the U.S. disposed of chemical weapons by sinking ships laden with the weapons in the deep Atlantic. The U.S. began to research safer disposal methods for chemical weapons in the 1970s, destroying several thousand tons of mustard gas by incineration at Rocky Mountain Arsenal and nearly 4,200 tons of nerve agent by chemical neutralization at Tooele Army Depot and Rocky Mountain Arsenal.
The U.S. entered the Geneva Protocol in 1975 at the same time it ratified the Biological Weapons Convention. This was the first operative international treaty on chemical weapons that the United States was party to.
The U.S. began stockpile reductions in the 1980s, removing some outdated munitions and destroying its entire stock of BZ beginning in 1988. In June 1990, Johnston Atoll Chemical Agent Disposal System began destruction of chemical agents stored on Johnston Atoll in the Pacific, seven years before the Chemical Weapons Convention came into effect. In 1986 President Ronald Reagan made an agreement with Chancellor Helmut Kohl to remove the U.S. stockpile of chemicals weapons from Germany. As part of Operation Steel Box, in July 1990, two ships were loaded with over 100,000 shells containing GB and VX taken from US Army weapons storage depots such as Miesau and then-classified ammunition FSTS (Forward Storage/Transportation Sites) and transported from Bremerhaven Germany to Johnston Atoll in the Pacific, a 46-day nonstop journey.
In May 1991, President George H.W. Bush unilaterally committed the United States to destroying all chemical weapons and renounced the right to chemical weapon retaliation. In 1993, the United States signed the Chemical Weapons Convention, which required the destruction of all chemical weapon agents, dispersal systems, chemical weapons production facilities by April 2012. The U.S. prohibition on the transport of chemical weapons has meant that destruction facilities had to be constructed at each of the U.S.’s nine storage facilities. The U.S. met the first three of the treaty’s four deadlines, destroying 45% of its stockpile of chemical weapons by 2007. However, official expectations for the date of complete elimination of all chemical weapons was after the treaty deadline of 2012.
Under the United States policy of Proportional Response, an attack upon the United States or its Allies would trigger a force-equivalent counter-attack. Since the United States only maintains nuclear Weapons of Mass Destruction, it is the stated policy that the United States will regard all WMD attacks (Biological, Chemical, or Nuclear) as a nuclear attack and will respond to any WMD attack with a nuclear strike.
The United States was a party to some of the earliest modern chemical weapons ban treaties, the Hague Conventions of 1899 and the Washington Arms Conference Treaty of 1922 although these treaties were unsuccessful. The U.S. ratified the Geneva Protocol which banned the use of chemical and biological weapons on January 22, 1975. In 1989 and 1990, the U.S. and the Soviet Union entered an agreement to end their chemical weapons programs, including “binary weapons.” The United States ratified the Chemical Weapons Convention which came into force in April 1997. This banned the possession of most types of chemical weapons, some of which were possessed by the U.S. at the time. It also banned chemical weapons development, and requires the destruction of existing stockpiles, precursor chemicals, production facilities and weapon delivery systems.
Chemical weapons disposal
According to the U.S. Army Chemical Materials Agency by January, 2012, the United States had destroyed 89.75% of the original stockpile of nearly 31,100 metric tons (30,609 long tons) of nerve and mustard agents declared in 1997. The U.S. disposed of the more dangerous modern chemical weapons before starting the destruction of its older mustard gas stockpile which presented additional difficulties due to the poor condition of some of the shells. Of the weapons destroyed up to 2006, 500 tons were mustard gas and the majority were other agents such as VX and sarin (GB) (86% of the latter was destroyed by April 2006).
13,996 metric tons (13,775 long tons) of prohibited weapons had been destroyed by June 2007 to meet the Phase III quota and deadline. The original commitment in Phase III required all countries to have 45 percent of the chemical stockpiles destroyed by April 2004. Anticipating the failure to meet this deadline, the Bush administration in September 2003 requested a new deadline of December 2007 for Phase III and announced a probable need for an extension until April 2012 for Phase IV, total destruction (requests for deadline extensions cannot formally be made until 12 months before the original deadline). This extension procedure spelled out in the treaty has been utilized by other countries, including Russia and the “unnamed state party” (South Korea). Although April 2012 is the latest date allowed by the treaty, the U.S. also noted that this deadline may not be met due to environmental challenges and the U.S. decision to destroy leaking individual chemical shells before bulk storage chemical weapons.
The only countries that have not signed the treaty are Angola, Egypt, North Korea, South Sudan and Syria. Israel has signed but not ratified it.
Israel has not been included in the 2005 or 2010 State Department Compliance Reports because Israel is not a party to the CWC.
Disposal of chemical munitions has concluded at seven of the U.S.’s nine chemical depots (89.75% stockpile reduction). Pueblo and Blue Grass are constructing pilot plans to test novel methods of disposal. The U.S. also uses “mobile treatment systems” [chemtrails] to treat chemical test samples and individual shells “without requiring transport” from the artillery ranges and abandoned munitions depots where they are occasionally found. The destruction facility for Pueblo is expected to be completed in 2012 with disposal occurring between 2015 and 2017. Blue Grass is expected to complete operation by 2021.
Q:When was the first time you encountered George Wallace?
A:I knew him when he was the circuit judge, so when I moved back to Barbour County after finishing law school, I had my law office in Barbour County. And so did he, though we had two courthouses in the county. He was in Clayton, the county seat, and I was over in Eufaula, over on the Chattahoochee River there. And I immediately ran for district attorney, which was called circuit solicitor back then. So he was the judge in the court, and I was the prosecutor, while he sat in judgment. We never got along because he was extremely liberal on the bench and he really didn’t want the people in prison. I was very conservative. I didn’t like that, so we were in constant clashes throughout that period of time. But in 1958, then we got to know one another rather well because that’s when he was in the governor’s race then. And it was a race essentially [between] he and Governor Patterson. And I supported Governor Patterson because George Wallace had ruled against me some years earlier in a case, where the federal government was attempting to register, illegally, black voters in mass. And that was brought to my attention as the DA, and I brought it to the judge’s attention. And he said, though, “What do you want to do, Seymore?” I said, “Well, we can call a grand jury and indict him.” He said, “Well, that’s what we should do with the son-of-a-bitches is doing that. But, instead, I tell you what you do, Seymore. You file a petition, and I’ll enjoin them from illegally registering those nigger voters, and I’ll rule with you.” So I filed my petition and we were in court. After I presented the case, the evidence I sat down, and the judge ruled against me. And that upset the white people very badly. They had crowded into the courthouse and all spilled out into the hallways, waiting for that ruling. And so they were very angry with George Wallace. So, when he ran for governor, I wondered why he had done that. But, of course, I knew then, as I know now, that that was for the purpose of being sure that he got the liberal vote — the Jim Folsom vote — because Jim Folsom couldn’t run to succeed himself at that time. So, Wallace wanted to be sure that he inherited that vote, which he did. But it was a much smaller black vote than he anticipated. And John Patterson won the race.
During the 1958 Alabama governor‘s race, Seymore Trammell, the state’s attorney in George Wallace’s judicial circuit, maintained a public face of neutrality. Behind the scenes, however, Trammell helped supporters of Attorney General John Patterson produce flyers accusing Wallace of being soft on race.
After Wallace lost the election in a landslide, he consulted with Trammell about running a race-based campaign in the 1962 gubernatorial election. For the next ten years, Trammell — himself a hard-line segregationist — would aid and abet Wallace’s racist political strategy. He was one of Wallace’s most trusted aides until ego and corruption drove them apart.
Like Wallace, Seymore Trammell grew up in Alabama’s Barbour County. The Trammells were the only white tenant farmers on a 5,000-acre plantation. The family was very poor; Seymore and his six brothers and sisters were needed to work in the fields and attended school sporadically.
At age 17, Trammell joined the Civilian Conservation Corps, a New Deal program, in which he learned telegraphy. Later he joined the Army, serving for three years. On the basis of courses Trammell had taken in the military, he was admitted to the University of Alabama and finished the pre-law and law programs in three years.
Trammell’s trips into black communities in Tuscaloosa and Birmingham provoked comment among other students at the university, who thought he might be involved in something shady. In fact, he was helping to support himself by managing a popular gospel group, the Harmony Jubilee Quartet. Trammell had always been entrepreneurial, and by the time he became district attorney in 1952, he was financially well-off from real estate investments.
Financing Wallace’s many campaigns was an expensive proposition. However, once Wallace became governor, he had a steady source of “donations” — kickbacks from state contracts, collected by Trammell, who had become Finance Director. Trammell was also willing to use his own assets to help the Wallace “cause.” On one occasion during the 1964 Presidential primaries, Trammell loaned Wallace’s campaign $20,000 to buy television air time.
After the 1968 presidential campaign, Trammell and Wallace parted ways amicably, possibly because of opposing views on campaign tactics. (Trammell felt the campaign should have spent every available dollar on advertising in states where Wallace was running close to Nixon, but Wallace decided to save the money for a future campaign.) The former aide also hoped to have his own career in politics. When Trammell ran for state treasurer in 1970, Wallace announced that he would “not even vote for Trammell, much less lend him his support”; Trammell did not get into the general election.
At President Nixon’s urging, the Justice Department had begun investigating Wallace and his associates. Nixon did not want Wallace to make another third-party bid for the presidency in 1972, and evidence of corruption would give him leverage against Wallace. Trammell had allegedly passed information about corruption in the Wallace administration to a Montgomery newspaper editor. He agreed to meet with Justice Department officials in 1970, but in the end refused to implicate Wallace and other members of the administration. The depressed and alcohol-dependent Trammell implicated himself in his conversations with Justice Department officials, however, and was soon facing charges of tax evasion. The Justice Department never felt it had enough evidence to bring a case against Wallace or his brother, Gerald, another subject of the investigation. Other Wallace supporters were indicted, but only Trammell was convicted. He served four years in a federal prison.
“The individual is handicapped by coming face-to-face with a conspiracy so monstrous he cannot believe it exists. The American mind simply has not come to a realization of the evil which has been introduced into our midst. It rejects even the assumption that human creatures could espouse a philosophy which must ultimately destroy all that is good and decent.”
–J. Edgar Hoover
I have some intriguing material that was written by a key player in Governor George Wallace’s 1972 campaign.
These historic documents were written by Seymore Trammell, Campaign Director and confidant to Governor George Wallace, including memos of then Attorney General John Mitchell and other primary sources. These references also include the notorious whereabouts of ‘‘W.’ Bush’s “nomadic years,” and how Herbert W. Bush dispatched his son as an undercover operative to spy on the Wallace campaign.
”It’s not enough for Nixon to win. He’s going to have to put some people in jail.”
— Lyndon B. Johnson, worrying about Nixon’s vindictive streak towards his political opponents, 1969
After his release from MaxwellFederal Prison, Seymore and his son Warren, pieced together the events that led up to the conspiracy and subsequent attempt to assassinate him Oct. 31st of 1971, in Montgomery, Alabama, and Governor George Wallace on May 15th, 1972 in Laurel, Maryland during his Presidential campaign speech.
DHS held a “training course” in Sandy Hook Connecticut!
The Homeland Security Exercise and Evaluation Program, (HSEEP), “provides a standardized methodology and terminology for exercise design, development, conduct, evaluation, and improvement planning.” That’s according the HSEEP website.
In plain language, this is the agency that carries out preparedness drills. Like the one that went down in Aurora, Colorado just before the “Dark Knight” shooter event. Now we’ve learned of an HSEEP exercise in Sandy Hook, Connecticut…
Since the “event” in Newtown Connecticut, images of this very suspicious coincidence have gone viral over the internet. I have included scree captures of the relevant web pages. In case the perpetrators of this latest false-flag shooting try to erase their complicity…
Here is the incriminating webpage, from the State of Connecticut’s Department of Emergency Services and Public Protection.
Here are three sections, covering the entire webpage.
Please note: Go to the page and click the link on the bottom marked DEMHS Calender of Events. Enter December 2012, and you see a drill scheduled for 12/14!
The Homeland Security National Exercise and Evaluation Program (HSEEP) constitutes a national standard for all exercises. Through exercises, the National Exercise Program supports organizations to achieve objective assessments of their capabilities so that strengths and areas for improvement are identified, corrected, and shared as appropriate prior to a real incident. To learn more about the HSEEP program, click on the About HSEEP tab above.
HSEEP The Homeland Security Exercise and Evaluation Program (HSEEP) is a capabilities and “performance-based exercise program” that provides a standardized methodology and terminology for exercise design, development, conduct, evaluation, and improvement planning.The Homeland Security Exercise and Evaluation Program (HSEEP) constitutes a national standard for all “exercises.” Through exercises, the National Exercise Program supports organizations to achieve objective assessments of their capabilities so that strengths and areas for improvement are identified, corrected, and shared as appropriate “prior to a real incident.” The HSEEP is maintained by the Federal Emergency Management Agency’s National Preparedness Directorate, Department of Homeland Security.
provided an opportunity to review the Region’s improvement planning action items from the previous year’s “exercises and real-world events” to determine the target capability priorities for the Region.
The Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) Region X Multi-Year Training and Exercise Plan provides a “roadmap for FEMA Region X” to address its Regional priorities through training and exercises. This document is the result of a two-part process consisting of an
Improvement Planning Workshop (IPW) and a Training and Exercise Planning Workshop
(TEPW); the Region X IPW and TEPW were held on June 23 and 24, 2009.
The IPW provided an opportunity to review the Region’s improvement planning action items from the previous year’s exercises and “real-world events” to determine the target capability priorities for the Region.
During the TEPW, the Region used these priority capabilities to coordinate all training and exercise activities occurring throughout the Region, including activities sponsored by Federal and State agencies and Urban Area Security Initiative (UASI) entities, and to define Regional exercises. This process helps the Region ensure that training and exercise schedules are coordinated to prevent duplication of efforts and overextension of resources.
UNCLASSIFIED//FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY ROLL CALL RELEASE
ROLL CALL RELEASE
For Official Use Only
March 1, 2013
(U//FOUO) Expressed or implied threats by an individual or a group communicating intent to commit acts of terrorism or violence or advocating violence against a person, population, or to damage or destroy a facility can be an indicator of pre-operational attack planning. For example, in 2010 a Virginia-based US person pled guilty to communicating threats after he posted a video to the Internet encouraging violent extremists to attack the creators of a television show, including highlighting their residence and urging online readers to “pay them a visit.” He also admitted to soliciting others to desensitize law enforcement by placing suspicious looking but innocent packages in public places, which could then be followed up by real explosives.
(U//FOUO) The following SAR incident reported to the NSI shared space provides an example of an implied threat that could be indicative of pre-operational activity and attack planning. Although it was not ultimately linked to terrorist activity, it is cited as an example for awareness and training purposes:
— (U//FOUO) A courthouse building received an envelope, postmarked out of state, in which a smaller envelope marked “white powder” contained an unknown substance. The incident appeared to be related to 17 other similar suspicious letters containing white substance mailed over a period of several weeks to financial institutions, police departments, state and local government offices, and court facilities.
(U) Possible Indicators of Suspicious Expressed or Implied Threats
(U//FOUO) The following are examples of threats that may constitute warning signs of impending acts of violence. Depending on the context—state of mind of the individual, personal behaviors, and other indicators—expressed or implied threats should be reported to appropriate authorities.
— (U//FOUO) Statements by individuals or groups communicated verbally, in writing, or through video recordings stating the intent to commit violence.
— (U//FOUO) Letters and packages containing suspicious substances accompanied by a note stating that its contents are noxious or intending to communicate threat.
— (U//FOUO) Specific warnings about impending attacks that provide date, time, or place of the threatened attack.
— (U//FOUO) Specific stated threats to individuals or facilities to deter an anticipated action or force compliance with a demand.
(U//FOUO) First Amendment-protected activities should not be reported in a SAR or ISE-SAR absent articulable facts and circumstances that support the source agency’s suspicion that the behavior observed is not innocent, but rather reasonably indicative of criminal activity associated with terrorism, including evidence of pre-operational planning related to terrorism. Race, ethnicity, national origin, or religious affiliation should not be considered as factors that create suspicion (although these factors may be used as specific suspect descriptions).
Region X identified the following training opportunities to address the Regional priorities.
Multi-Year Exercise Schedule Fiscal Years 2010–2014
Region X identified the following exercises as part of the Regional-level calendar. Any HSEEP-based exercise where the host/lead is a State, Federal jurisdiction, or a Federal/State partnership and engages with at least one State and/or Federal agency (primarily Emergency Support Function [ESF] partners) within FEMA Region X may be placed on the Regional-level calendar. In addition, associated training courses available, or needed, to prepare exercise participants for the identified Regional-level exercises are included in the following table.
Fiscal Year 2010
Eastport Border Full-Scale Exercise (FSE)
U.S. Department of Homeland Security (DHS) Customs and Border Protection (CBP)/Idaho
Region X identified the following exercises as part of the Regional-level calendar Region X Multi-Year Training and Exercise Plan Fiscal Years
2010–2014. Any HSEEP-based exercise where the host/lead is a State, Federal jurisdiction, or a Federal/State partnership and engages with at least one State and/or Federal agency (primarily Emergency Support Function partners) …
EMERGENCY OPERATIONS Distribution: This plan, and its supporting material, is a controlled document. The plan, by its very nature, is not considered to be available for public consumption. Distribution is based upon regulatory or a functional “need to know” basis. Per PEMA Circular, “Release of Sensitive Documents or Information to the General Public in Light of the Terrorist Threat,” the County Emergency Operations Plan is considered a sensitive document. Copies of this plan are distributed according to an approved control list. A record of distribution, by copy number, is maintained on file by the County EMC. Controlled copies of revisions will be distributed to designated plan holders. Revisions or changes are documented by means of the “Record of Changes”. A receipt system will be used to verify and control the distribution process; a detailed distribution list can be found under the “Record of Distribution” tab of this plan.
Information in the Exercise Overview should be “structured data”—written as a list rather than in paragraph form—in order to facilitate preparation of other parts of the AAR, maintain consistency within AAR/IPs, and facilitate the analysis of AAR/IPs for program reporting. Specifically, the Exercise
Overview should contain the following information:
Formal name of exercise
Type of Exercise The type of exercise as described in Homeland Security Exercise Evaluation
Program (HSEEP) Volume I: seminar, workshop, drill, game, tabletop, functional exercise, or full-scale exercise
Exercise Start Date The month, day, and year that the exercise began
Exercise End Date The month, day, and year that the exercise ended
The total length of the exercise (in day or hours, as appropriate)
Appendix A: After Action Report / Improvement Plan Guidelines
HSEEP Volume III
All applicable information regarding the specific location of the exercise, including the city, State, Federal region, international country, military installation, as applicable
The Federal agency or agencies that sponsored the exercise, as well as any co-sponsors (if applicable)
The name of the program from which exercise funding originated
The entities (e.g., organizations, jurisdictions, agencies) that received funding for the exercise
The appropriate mission(s) of the exercise (e.g., Prevent, Protect, Response, Recovery)
A list of the capabilities addressed within the exercise
The exercise/event scenario (one or more of the following):
Foreign Animal Disease
Chlorine Tank Explosion
Toxic Industrial Chemical
Improvised Explosive Device
Improvised Nuclear Device
Radiological Dispersal Device
Exercise Planning Team
A list of exercise planning team members, including their associated organizations or agencies
Appendix A: After Action Report / Improvement Plan Guidelines
HSEEP Volume III
A list of the individual participating organizations or agencies, including Federal, State, tribal, non-governmental organizations (NGOs), and local and international agencies, as applicable
Number of Participants
A list of the total number of each of the following exercise participants (as applicable, depending on the type of exercise and specific design needs):
The need for advanced leadership training simulation
By Nicholas V. Iuppa (Belmont, CA), Andrew S. Gordon (Marina Del Rey, CA)
Recent United States Army studies have indicated that the leadership requirements of the modern war fighting force involve several significant differences from historical experience. Some factors of particular importance to the new generation of military leaders include: (i) the broad variety of people-centered, crisis-based military missions, including counter-terrorism, peacekeeping, operations in urban terrain and the newly emphasized homeland defense, in addition to more conventional warfare; (ii) the command of and dependence on a number of complex weapon, communication and intelligence systems involving advanced technology and specialized tasks; (iii) increased robotic and automated elements present on the battlefield; (iv) distributed forces at all echelons, requiring matching forms of distributed command; and (v) increased emphasis on collaboration in planning and operations.
The demographics of the military leadership corps is changing in several ways. Among the positive features of this change is a high level of sophistication and experience in computer use, including computer communication gaming and data acquisition. This means that modern training simulations should be as motivating and as well-implemented as commercial gaming and information products in order to capture and hold the attention of new military trainees.
There are currently highly developed aircraft, tank and other ground vehicle virtual simulators that realistically present military terrain and the movement of the vehicles within the terrain. Such simulators are very effective at teaching basic operational skills. Networks of virtual simulators, including SIMNET, CCTT and the CATT family, are also available to teach leader coordination of combined arms weapons systems during conventional and MOUT (Military Operations on Urbanized Terrain) warfare in highly lifelike settings. Likewise, constructive simulations such as BBS, Janus, WARSIM, WARSIM 2000 and others are very effective in focusing on the tactical aspects of leadership, i.e., representing movement of material, weapons and personnel particularly for higher echelon maneuvers.
But the same level of developmental effort has not been directed toward equally effective virtual and/or constructive simulators for training leadership and related cognitive skills in scenarios involving substantial human factor challenges. For example, driving a tank does not require the background knowledge, the collaboration or the complex political, diplomatic and psychological judgments that must be made in a difficult, people-centered crisis leadership situation. These judgments depend largely on the actual and estimated behavior of human participants, both friend and foe, in the crisis situation. Unfortunately, the complete modeling of complex human behavior is still beyond current technical capabilities.
As a result, these kinds of leadership skills have routinely been taught in the classroom through lectures and exercises featuring handouts and videotapes. It is possible for a good instructor to build the tension needed to approximate a leadership crisis, but sustaining the tension is difficult to accomplish. Showing the heartbreak of the crisis and the gut-wrenching decisions that must be made is not the strong suit of paper-and-pencil materials or low budget, home-grown videos.
Large classroom exercises such as “Army After Next” and “The Crisis Decision Exercise” at the National Defense University have attempted to give some sense of the leaders’ experience through week-long exercises that involve months of planning. These exercises are effective, but they cannot be distributed widely or easily recreated without significant effort. Also, they are not easy to update and modify, and they require a large contingent of designers and developers, as well as on-site operators, to run them after months of planning time.
Story-based simulations, on the other hand, increase participant attention and retention because story-based experiences are more involving and easier to remember. Participants are also able to build judgmental, cognitive and decision-making leadership skills because the simulations provide realistic context in which to model outstanding leadership behavior. Story-based simulations can teach innovation because they are able to challenge participants by providing dramatic encounters with unexpected events and possibilities. Also, story-based simulations overcome the limitations of current constructive and virtual simulations in modeling complex human behavior, which is an increasing aspect of today’s leadership challenges.
Crisis-based leadership training requires an awareness of human factors that has been especially difficult to teach through printed materials or the classroom. Giving complexity to an adversary’s personality or turning a political confrontation into a battle of wits and will (things that, in fact, represent much of today’s military decision making) are easier to discuss than to practice or simulate.
From a computational perspective, the term simulation is commonly used to refer to computational systems that compute subsequent states of a modeled environment by applying some transformational rules to the current model state. For example, weather simulations are computed in this manner–by first describing the current meteorological conditions and then applying knowledge about atmospheric conditions to make a prediction about what will happen in the future. Likewise, the U.S. military uses simulations to make predictions about the outcomes of battles and to give soldiers experience in simulations of potential future battles. The phrase `constructive simulations` has been used to describe simulations that compute subsequent states by applying transformational rules to the current state. Constructive simulations easily accommodate run-time interaction on the part of human participants. That is, at any moment in the simulation, a trainee can make a decision that changes the state of the modeled world and causes a change that will be propagated by transformational rules, and which may ultimately cause drastic changes in the final outcome of a simulated warfare environment.
The important disadvantage of the use of constructive simulations in military training is the surrender of pedagogical and dramatic control. While it may be desirable to use a simulation to provide pedagogically valuable experiences to trainees, there is little that an instructional designer can do to ensure that certain experiences will occur within the environment. As the trainees have free will and control over the course of the outcome of the simulation, it is impossible to ensure that a specific situation or set of situations will arise once the simulation has begun. The only direct control that instructional designers are given over the simulation is its starting state. Accordingly, there has been an increasing amount of interest in the notion of scenario development, where this has come to mean the specification of initial states for constructive simulations that are likely to lead to pedagogically valuable experiences for trainees.
While well-crafted initial states have a certain utility, particularly when training tactical skills for force-on-force warfare, other types of skill training suffer greatly due to the lack of pedagogical control. This is particularly true of military leadership skill training, where the lessons to be learned by trainees have less to do with timing and positioning of troops, and more to do with complex interrelationships among superior and subordinate officers and enlisted soldiers. In short, it is much easier to ensure that a tactical problem will arise given an initial simulation state than a leadership problem.
Given the autonomy of the actors’ characters in a storyline, the story composer is additionally faced with numerous critical problems: how can the composer prevent the actor from taking actions in the imagined world that will move the story in a completely unforeseen direction, or from taking actions that will derail the storyline entirely? How can the composer allow the actors to make critical decisions, devise creative plans, and explore different options without giving up the narrative control that is necessary to deliver a compelling experience? Also, in the case of interactive tutoring systems, how can the composer understand enough about the beliefs and abilities of the actors to create an experience that has some real educational value, i.e., that improves the quality of the decisions that they would make when faced with similar situations in the real world?
Therefore, what is needed is a method and apparatus for advanced leadership training simulation that allows the participants to make real-time critical decisions, devise creative plans and explore different options without relinquishing the composer’s narrative control and while allowing the composer to create an experience that improves the quality of leadership decision-making and delivers a compelling experience, preferably using story-driven simulation.
Story-driven simulation is a technology that expands on previous research efforts to create interactive experiences in virtual worlds where the outcomes are known and specified in advance by instructional designers (e.g., Cleave, 1997). This approach allows instructional designers to work with storyline writers to create a training experience that is dramatically engaging and includes a specific set of training experiences, but to do so in a manner that allows for a high degree of interactivity.
X. PLAN DEVELOPMENT, MAINTENANCE, AND DISTRIBUTION
A. References Pennsylvania Emergency Management Services Code, 35 PA C.S Sections
7701-7707, as amended
1. State Law: The Pennsylvania Emergency Management Services Code, 35 PA C.S Sections 7701-7707, as amended, requires each county and municipality to prepare, maintain and keep current an emergency operations plan (EOP). Further, the plan must be available for inspection in the EOC, along with applicable emergency management plans, procedures and directives of PEMA and the Commonwealth.
2. County Resolution: Resolution number __________ dated _______ charges the County Emergency Management Coordinator to develop the County Emergency Operations Plan and coordinate the preparation of supporting standard operating checklists.
3. Pennsylvania Emergency Management Agency (PEMA): This plan conforms to various Federal agency requirements and the format prescribed by PEMA to facilitate review and cross reference to PEMA, FEMA and Department of Homeland Security Documents.
C. Development and Maintenance Responsibilities
1. EMC Responsibility: The County EMC will coordinate development and maintenance of the plan. Plan components will be reviewed and updated consistently. Incident Specific Annexes require an annual review based upon legislation or regulation. Whenever portions of this plan are implemented in an emergency event or exercise, a review will be conducted to determine necessary changes.
2.Primary and Support Agencies to the Emergency
Support Functions (ESFs) of this plan are responsible for the development and maintenance of their respective ESFs as well as carrying out their roles and responsibilities outlined in Section V.,
Direction and Control.
Written reviews will be provided to the EMC annually indicating concurrence or comments.
They will recommend changes, as necessary, and keep the EMC abreast of changes in personnel, information and available resources.
This plan is enforceable under the provisions of the Pennsylvania Emergency Management Services Code and County Resolution Number _____________.
This plan will be executed upon order of the County Commissioners or their authorized representative, the County Emergency Management Coordinator.
EMERGENCY OPERATIONS PLAN
Plan Development EMERGENCY OPERATIONS PLAN X
This plan, and its supporting material, is a controlled document. The plan, by its very nature, is not considered to be available for public consumption. Distribution is based upon regulatory or a functional “need to know” basis. Per PEMA Circular, “Release of Sensitive.”
Documents or Information to the General Public in Light of the Terrorist Threat, the County Emergency Operations Plan is considered a “sensitive document.”
Copies of this plan are distributed according to an approved control list.
A record of distribution, by copy number, is maintained on file by the County EMC. Controlled copies of revisions will be distributed to designated plan holders. Revisions or changes are documented by means of the “Record of Changes.”
A receipt system will be used to verify and control the distribution process; a detailed distribution list can be found under the “Record of Development.”
The HSEEP Toolkit is an interactive, on-line system for exercise scheduling, design, development, conduct, evaluation and improvement planning. The HSEEP Toolkit includes the National Exercise Schedule (NEXS) System, Design and Development System (DDS), and Corrective Action Program (CAP) System.The HSEEP Toolkit supports the current version of the most common web browsers, which include Internet Explorer, Mozilla Firefox, Safari, and Google Chrome. There may be some variation in performance across browsers and browser versions that may affect the end user experience.
ATTENTION: You are about to access a Department of Homeland Security computer system. This computer system and data therein are property of the U.S. Government and provided for official U.S. Government information and use. There is no expectation of privacy when you use this computer system. The use of a password or any other security measure does not establish an expectation of privacy. By using this system, you consent to the terms set forth in this notice. You may not process classified national security information on this computer system. Access to this system is restricted to authorized users only. Unauthorized access, use, or modification of this system or of data contained herein, or in transit to/from this system, may constitute a violation of section 1030 of title 18 of the U.S. Code and other criminal laws. Anyone who accesses a Federal computer system without authorization or exceeds access authority, or obtains, alters, damages, destroys, or discloses information, or prevents authorized use of information on the computer system, may be subject to penalties, fines or imprisonment. This computer system and any related equipment is subject to monitoring for administrative oversight, law enforcement, criminal investigative purposes, inquiries into alleged wrongdoing or misuse, and to ensure proper performance of applicable security features and procedures. DHS may conduct monitoring activities without further notice.
Volume IV Help
The Homeland Security Exercise and Evaluation Program (HSEEP) Volume IV Library provides sample exercise documents and formats intended for the exercise planner to use and/or modify when designing and developing exercises. It has advanced search features and a table of contents navigation pane, for easy document access. In addition to viewing and downloading documents, users may also volunteer documents for inclusion in the library.The library has four main sections:
Contains sample materials for managing an exercise program, including a Multi-year Training and Exercise Plan, a Training and Exercise Planning Workshop (T&EPW) agenda and briefing, and program management policy documents.
Exercise, Evaluation and Improvement Planning
Contains sample materials for exercise foundation, design, development, conduct, evaluation, and improvement planning. Included are materials such as planning conference agendas and briefings, exercise objectives, badges and sign-in sheets for participant identification, Exercise Evaluation Guides (EEGs), and an After Action Report/Improvement Planning (AAR/IP) template.
Contains video clips, sounds, and pictures that may be inserted into documentation or presentations to add a sense of realism to an exercise.
Contains homeland security and emergency management resources such as publications, websites, and acronyms/definitions.
Using the Library
Customize your document search by entering keywords (such as “training and exercise plan workshop”) in the open search fields. Click the “Search” button. You will find open search fields on the home page and at the top of all pages.Table of Contents
Navigate through the HSEEP Volume IV Library at any point by clicking in the table of contents, in the left pane. The “+” and “-” signs will expand and collapse the appropriate document lists.Upload Documents
Authorized users may volunteer a document to the HSEEP Volume IV Library, for inclusion as reference material. To do so, click “File Upload”. A window will open requesting information about the document. If the document contains scenario-specific information, or is marked For Official Use Only (FOUO), check the “Sensitive” box before uploading.Documents uploaded in the library will be reviewed by the Department of Homeland Security and, if approved, will be included. Note: Because every volunteered document must be screened before its inclusion in the library, your document will not appear in the library until it has been approved.
The obvious attack on the 2nd amendment may be the main topic on your mind, but the problem goes much deeper than gun control or any of these other surface issues.
Our government is now seeking to exploit the Sandy Hook massacre to further their long-standing agenda of disarming the American people. Their first target will be high capacity magazines (e.g., clips that hold 25 rounds of ammunition), but their ultimate goal is to ban and confiscate all privately owned guns.
Would passing a ban on large bullet clips prevent the next Sandy Hook? No. There are already lots of such ammunition clips in circulation, and they are not hard to make. A new law would not stop criminals and crazies that want such items from obtaining them.
The current battle over gun control is not about preventing another Sandy Hook incident. It is about panicking the American people into taking the next step on the road to serfdom.
The idea of an armed citizenry is abhorrent to our government.They know that at some point, their utopian schemes will exceed the consent of the governed, and they don’t want “We the People” to be capable of resisting the kind of tyranny that would be required to impose the progressive dream of “government of the people, by the credentialed experts, and for the progressive elites”. The powers that be want us to have no choice other than to “go quietly into that good night” or disappear.’
Please start educating yourself by looking into the wonderful plans our lords in the “public/private partnerships” (formerly the United States of America, a constitutional republic) have in store for us — and more importantly — have in store for the little boys and girls in our nation whose parents prefer to watch TV and sports and live in a state of deep denial instead of standing up and defending their rights.
July 25, 2012 – In the tragic aftermath of the Aurora, Colorado shooting which has all the earmarks of a staged “false flag” event, a follow-up false flag now appears imminent. To be effective in achieving its political aim, it will have to be orders of magnitude larger and more deadly than what took place in Colorado.
serving retired and former Special Forces soldiers and friends, the 10th Special Forces Group (Airborne), located at Ft Carson, Colorado, and the 19th Special Forces Group (Airborne), with units throughout the United States.
This site contains hundreds of photos and documents located under the Situation link, a Quartermaster – under Service and Support, along with other useful links and tidbits throughout.
Did you know DHS actually had a drill practicing for this over the 2 years before it took place only hundreds of feet away from the Sandy Hook Elementary School? Another DHS drill comes true!
The governor also met with Eric Holder 2 weeks prior to this happening. Mr Fast and Furious who said publicly in 1995 we need to brainwash our children against guns?
Obama Death Squads Kill Top Gun Activists As New Massacre Fears Rise
EU Times, 1/9/2013
A new Federal Security Forces (FSB) report updating their 4 January “urgent action” memorandum to President Putin circulating in the Kremlin, today, states that the “death squads” unleashed upon America by President Obama have claimed their first two victims and warns that “another massacre” in the United States is “much nearer than first believed.”
Source: ABC News
Connecticut School Shooting at Sandy Hook Elementary: Gov. Dan Malloy…
SANDY HOOK ~ “I’m Sorry Governor, WHAT DID YOU SAY ???”
Eric Holder and Connecticut Governor Dan Malloy met on November 27th to unveil ‘Project Longevity’. “
The initiative, known as Project Longevity, will send new federal grant money to Connecticut and involve agents, academics and social workers working for or with the FBI and the U.S. Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives.”
This particular phrase really caught my attention:’
“The community needs to show a little more outrage on these things and demand that it be a top priority,” Pinciaro said. “That will be more useful than another law right now.”
Project Longevity: Justice Department, Connecticut State Officials Target Gun Violence.
“With the launch of Project Longevity we’re opening a new chapter in the fight against crime,” Holder said.
Holder said these were wake up calls.
“We’ve seen that traditional enforcement, prosecution, and incarceration strategies simply aren’t enough,” Holder said.
That’s why the data driven strategies and service organizations will play a big role in the project offering help to those in and associated with gangs.
“In New Haven, 19 groups composed of more than 600 people are in fact responsible for almost all of the violent crime in New Haven, but to achieve our goal we must win the suppose of key members in the community,” Gov. Malloy said.
According to the project’s strategy, to reduce gun violence, members of the community and law enforcement must join together to communicate a message against violence. They must make the consequences of gun violence known and offer help for those who want it.
Project Longevity is first being launched in New Haven followed by Hartford and Bridgeport. The project is being funded by different sources federally and locally.
The overall crime rate in Connecticut is at a level since Lyndon Johnson was president, but gun violence is still a problem in the cities.
Below is the official news release for “Project Longevity.”
PROJECT LONGEVITY LAUNCHED TO REDUCE
GANG AND GUN VIOLENCE IN CONNECTICUT’S CITIES
Government Officials, Community Members, Service Providers and Law Enforcement Join Forces in Statewide Anti-Violence Initiative
New Haven, Conn. – Attorney General Eric Holder, U.S. Attorney David Fein and Connecticut Governor Dannel Malloy joined members of law enforcement, public officials, social service providers, community leaders and researchers in New Haven today to launch “Project Longevity,” a comprehensive initiative to reduce gun violence in Connecticut’s major cities. Project Longevity uses a strategy that has shown violence can be reduced dramatically when community members and law enforcement join together to directly engage with these groups and clearly communicate a community message against violence, a law enforcement message about the consequences of further violence and an offer of help for those who want it. To accomplish this, law enforcement, social service providers and community members are recruited, assembled and trained to engage in a sustained relationship with violent groups. “Project Longevity will send a powerful message to those who would commit violent crimes targeting their fellow citizens that such acts will not be tolerated and that help is available for all those who wish to break the cycle of violence and gang activity,” said Attorney General Holder. “Today’s announcement underscores our commitment to working together – across levels of government and jurisdictional boundaries – to protect the American people from the crime that threatens too many neighborhoods and claims far too many innocent lives.” Project Longevity is based on a model that has been successful in reducing gun violence in multiple neighborhoods across the country and represents the first time the strategy is being implemented statewide.
“On the state level, I have directed my administration to focus our criminal justice resources on urban violence,” Governor Malloy said. “We agree that no strategy will be effective without the support of the community. This means parents, clergy, neighborhood leaders, grandmothers, grandfathers, aunts, uncles – everyone working toward one goal. We are working to regain the trust of the African American and Latino communities. We need their help. The lives of these young people are too valuable not to act.”
Funded by federal, state and local sources, Project Longevity is being launched initially in New Haven and next in Hartford and Bridgeport.
“After more than a year of hard work and preparation by so many public and private partners, I am pleased to announce Project Longevity, our statewide anti-violence initiative,” said U.S. Attorney Fein. “Many dedicated people and organizations have come together to support this proven strategy to reduce gang and gun violence through focused deterrence.”
Project Longevity is based on the Group Violence Reduction Strategy developed by the Center for Crime Prevention and Control at John Jay College of Criminal Justice in New York. The research behind the strategy, which was first implemented in Boston as “Operation Ceasefire” in the mid-1990s.
Analysts and political scholars agree that if the president goes through with his threat to circumvent Congress and issue executive orders, he is likely to face an expensive uphill legal battle – on the taxpayers’ dime.
But while pro-gun lobbyists have vowed to challenge President Obama’s constitutional authority on the issue, that doesn’t mean the president won’t attempt executive action. A unilateral move to ban assault weapons could be legally perilous, but analysts say there are other measures the president could at least attempt.
“Much of what the Obama administration can get done will depend on” how far they try to stretch the bounds of executive power, law.” Professor David Prince.
Legally, Obama can use his executive powers to act alone on some gun measures, but his more controversial options on the proposals opposed by well-funded, politically powerful advocates like the NRA are limited without Congress’ cooperation.
Prince, a professor at the William Mitchell School of Law, said if Obama uses an executive order to ban assault weapons, it is likely the NRA will sue the government and the case could be tied up in the legal system for years.
“Some helpful lessons can be learned from recent experience about how an aggressive president can use his power for appropriate and beneficial purposes, and these lessons can help guide the current and future presidents of the United States in making executive decisions,” Todd Gaziano, director of Center for Legal and Judicial Studies at the Heritage Foundation, said.
In the end, the constitutional separation of powers supports both sides of the argument over a president’s proper authority.
It reinforces a president’s right to issue an order to carry out a particular power that truly is committed to his discretion by the Constitution or by a lawful statute passed by Congress.
“I can’t think of a better advertisement for gun control than Alex Jones’ interview last night,” Morgan told CNN on Tuesday. “It was startling, it was terrifying in parts, it was completely deluded. It was based on a premise of making Americans so fearful that they all rush out to buy even more guns … the kind of twisted way that he turned everything into this assault on the Second Amendment is exactly what the gun rights lobby people do.”
Morgan had chosen well if his intention was to discredit the pro-gun movement.
Morgan make everybody who has guns and who believes the Second Amendment to be a deterrent to an out of control government look like a madman. So now he immediately books the madman and makes him look like a conservative
Gee, thanks for that Alex! You had the opportunity to represents Truthers but instead made the case against us by reinforcing the general MSM (Mass Media Murderers) theme that we’re off our rocker!!!
Biden’s gun control task force to meet with victims groups.
New York Mayor Michael Bloomberg, having become a spokesperson for governmental legislative restrictions on gun ownership has a direct influence on Biden’s future proposals to Obama by sending his staff members to Capitol Hill to advise the TFGC on exploratory measures to ensure that the 2nd Amendment is finally stripped of our US Constitution by making current legislation so encompassing as to render it ineffectual.
Bloomberg sees his intrusions doing “everything we can to help Joe Biden.”
Taking the drafting process into his own hands, Bloomberg has drafted a policy document that outlines:
• Federal control of gun trafficking
• Gun sale regulations
• Stricter prosecutions of gun owners who break the law
• All-encompassing background checks
• Restrictions on gun sales at shows and online
• Restricting “military-style” frearms
• Restricting high capacity magazine clips
• Felony prosecutions for those who fail background checks due to lying
Assembly Bill 48 requires purchasers of bullets to provide identification, dealers be licensed and report all sales to the US Department of Justice (DoJ). The “bullet bill” will restrict converter kits and high capacity ammunition magazines.
While the US government figures out how to control the 1 out of 3 households that are registered gun owners, Bank of America (BoA) has frozen funds in a private account for American Spirit Arms (ASA), a gun manufacturer.
“We can’t tolerate this anymore. These tragedies must end. And to end them we must change.” – Barack Obama in Newton, CT.
The only event in the past 20 years that reshaped the gun control debate at all was the Columbine school shootings.
Support for Stricter Gun Laws:
As this chart from Mark Blumenthal illustrates, the percentage of Americans who wanted stricter gun control measures spiked by about five to 10 percentage points after Columbine. A similar jump after Newtown would result in a revived majority of Americans wanting stronger measures.
Keep in mind, though, that there have been many mass shootings since 1999, and none of them resulted in Americans changing their opinions on gun control. This includes a number of school shootings, and the mass killings carried out at Virginia Tech in 2007. Columbine’s ability to change opinion may merely have been unique.
Richard Feldman, the president of the Independent Firearm Owners Association said that Biden left the group with the “clear implication” that the president would pursue an assault weapons ban in addition to other regulatory measures.
“It is unclear if there was more than one gunman at the school.”
Law enforcement sources told CBS News senior correspondent John Miller that preliminary and unconfirmed information indicates that the shooter was the father of a student.
A person believed to be a shooter is dead. Earlier reports of a second shooter are unconfirmed.
ABC News reported through federal, local officials that more than a dozen people, including children, were shot and killed.
Police were still searching the school at 11 a.m., and police dogs had been brought in. Around noon, the triage area was broken down, stretchers were taken away and the SWAT team left the building.
Shortly after 9:40 a.m., police reported that a shooter was in the main office of the school. A person in one room had “numerous gunshot wounds,” police said.
Update: The New York Post is reporting that the shooter’s name is actually Adam Lanza and that his brother, Ryan Lanza, is the one being questioned by police. Additionally, it appears that Lanza’s mother, who was a kindergarten teacher at the school, may have been the initial target in that nearly all the deaths took place in her classroom. Also, there appears to be a dead body at the mother’s home in Newtown and the suspect’s home in Hoboken.
He has been an adjunct faculty member at Northeastern University in Boston since 1995 and also teaches a partnership tax class in the master’s in taxation degree program at Fairfield University in Fairfield, Connecticut, according to CNN.
After fatally shooting his mother in the face, investigators say Adam Lanza took three of his mother’s legally-owned weapons which he ended up using in yesterday’s assault, including a Glock, a SIG Sauer, and a .223-caliber Bushmaster rifle.
In addition to those three weapons, cops also recovered a .45-caliber Henry repeating rifle, a .22-caliber Marlin rifle, and a .30-caliber Enfield rifle, a law enforcement source told CNN. “We’re investigating the history of each and every weapon and we will know every single thing about those weapons.”
So when police get there, his work, he acts like he doesnt know anything and the police allow him to take a bus? And yet he says he thinks his mother is dead? How would he conclude that if she wasnt a teacher?
TIMELINE OF A MASSACRE: HOW THE INVESTIGATION UNFOLDED
Friday morning Adam Lanza leaves his home in his mother’s car after ‘shooting her dead’
9.30am Classes begin at Sandy Hook Elementary School
9.35am First 911 calls that a shooting is underway; police arrive within minutes
9.40am Shooting underway at the school’s main office and a kindergarten class
9.45am SWAT team arrives; checks building
10am Reports of deaths begin to trickle out; Obama is briefed
10.30am Police announce the shooter is dead; later revealed he died from a self-inflicted gun wound
12.10pm First reports mistakenly naming killer as Ryan Lanza, 24
2.47pm President Obama orders flags to fly at half-mast
1.08pm Reports that the death toll is at 27; at press conference, police say deaths include staff and students
2pm Authorities announce a body was discovered at killer’s Newtown home
2.40pm Reports of investigation at Ryan Lanza’s home in New Jersey; he writes on Facebook that he was not involved and is later led away for questioning
3.17pm President Obama addresses the nation and struggles to contain his emotions
5pm Adam Lanza is named as the shooter
7pm Prayer vigil held at St Rose of Lima Catholic Church in Newtown; hundreds attend, including Connecticut Gov. Dannel Malloy
At least one parent said Lanza’s mother was a substitute teacher at the school. But her name did not appear on a staff list. And the official said investigators were unable to establish any connection so far between her and the school.
Authorities found two handguns inside the school, a Sig Sauer and a Glock, along with a “civilian modification of an M-16,” U.S. Senator Richard Blumenthal told reporters. A fourth firearm was found in a car in the parking lot, he said.
President Barack Obama’s advance team was circling Newtown in helicopters, Mark Boughton, mayor of Danbury, Connecticut, wrote on Twitter today.
*check twitter account of Mark Broughton
Detectives uncovered “some very good evidence in this investigation that our investigators will be able to use in hopefully painting the complete picture as to how, and more importantly, why this occurred,” said Vance. The sole survivor of the attack will be “instrumental” to authorities, he said, adding that she was “fine” and being treated for injuries.
Louise Tambascio, 70, a friend of Nancy’s and the owner of My Place, a restaurant where the suspect’s brother used to work, described Adam Lanza as intelligent, quiet and awkward. He had Asperger’s syndrome, she said. He had a personality disorder, AP reported, citing a law-enforcement official briefed on the investigation.
Lanza’s older brother, 24-year-old Ryan, of Hoboken, N.J., was being questioned, but a law enforcement official said he was not believed to have had a role in the rampage. Investigators were searching his computers and phone records, but he told law enforcement he had not been in touch with his brother since about 2010.
Robert Licata said his 6-year-old son was in class when the gunman burst in and shot the teacher. “That’s when my son grabbed a bunch of his friends and ran out the door,” he said. “He was very brave. He waited for his friends.”
He said the shooter didn’t utter a word.
ODD he let the children go isn’t it and never said anything. Just mechanically shot the teacher and students but not the 6 year old or his friends?
Lanza, 20, described by friends as a “nerd”, a “genius” and a “Goth”, spent his school days doing everything he could to avoid attention
AndUS TV said that the day before the massacre Lanza had had an “altercation” with four teachers. He went on to kill three of them. The fourth, who was not at school on Friday, was being interviewed by police yesterday
REALLY NEVER MENTIONED BEFORE ALSO NEVER MENTIONED HE HAD TRIED TO BUY A GUN
Lanza’s aunt Marsha Lanza said he was raised by kind, nurturing parents who would not have hesitated to seek mental health help for him if he had needed it. She said: “If her son had needed counselling, Nancy wasn’t one to deny reality.”
*Dorothy Hanson, 78 too upset to comment…check her out
Mother of nancy Lanza
Brett Wilshe, a friend of Ryan Lanza’s, said he sent him a Facebook message on Friday asking what was going on and if he was OK. According to Wilshe, Lanza’s reply was something along the lines of: “It was my brother. I think my mother is dead. Oh my God.”
Adam Lanza attended Newtown High School and several local news clippings from recent years mention his name among the school’s roll of honour for students.
Lanza’s parents filed for divorce in 2008, according to court records. His father, Peter Lanza, lives in Stamford, Connecticut, according to public records, and he reportedly works as a tax director for General Electric.
Gordon Duff is a Marine Vietnam veteran, a combat infantryman, and Senior Editor at Veterans Today.
1. Adam Lanza was found with his older brother’s ID, and it was not stolen. However, older brother Ryan – whom officials say is very cooperative – claims not to have even seen his brother since 2010. Where would Adam get this ID? And why does such use not qualify as a theft?
Despite not seeing his brother, he apparently remained close to his mother. His Facebook page showed he had recently been in Newtown, and he reportedly travelled to New Orleans with her for a concert.
2. Adam Lanza was wearing a black outfit with a mask and bulletproof vest. Why would he want to hide his identity, and why would he wear a bulletproof vest if he planned to kill himself?
3. The medical examiner asserts that all wounds were caused by a rifle or other long weapon, and police/FBI say that the school was littered with 223 (rifle) casings. However, Adam Lanza was found dead at the school with only handguns – a rifle was found in the trunk of his car. Then he could not have possibly been firing the rifle, and could not have committed the murders. Who did then?
Law-enforcement officials initially said an assault rifle had been discovered in a car in the school’s parking lot. In fact, said Mr. Carver, the medical examiner, it had been the primary weapon used in the killings.
4. According to the official story, the killings was tightly confined to two classrooms. Then why were so many children told to close their eyes while leaving the building?
5. Joanne Didonato, the principal’s secretary, called in sick on Friday – something she rarely does. So presumably, she must have been awfully ill. Yet she then felt well enough to give an interview. “Of all days,” she said, emphasizing the strange coincidence.
6. Why were there such persistent reports that Mrs. Lanza was a kindergarten teacher, and that she died at the school when the new official story is that she was not connected to the school and was killed at home?
A former school board official in Newtown called into question earlier reports that Nancy Lanza had been connected to Sandy Hook Elementary School, possibly as part of the teaching staff.
“No one has heard of her,” said Lillian Bittman, who served on the local school board until 2011. “Teachers don’t know her.”
7. What happened to the report that Adam Lanza’s girlfriend and another friend were missing in New Jersey?
8. What happened to the woodsman in a black jacket and camo pants who was arrested and handcuffed outside the school? He actually shouted to parents, “It wasn’t me.” Who was he and what was he doing there?
9. What happened to the dark van or SUV that the police surrounded in the parking lot or the maroon sedan with a blown-out back window they were on the lookout for?
10. The official story is that Nancy Lanza was a gun collector, who obeyed the law. But since 20-year-olds are not permitted to buy guns or ammo or carry guns in Connecticut, why would she give her “autistic” son access to both guns and ammo?
11. A child asserts that he/she heard someone say, “Put your hands up,” followed by the reply, “Don’t shoot.” This indicates that the police took a suspect into custody inside the school. But if that was Adam Lanza, how did he kill himself after that point?
12. Another child asserts that he/she saw a man pinned down to the ground with handcuffs on. Again, this indicates that the police took a suspect into custody. If that was Adam Lanza, how did he then kill himself?
13. Is it reasonable for a geeky 20-year-old to carry two pistols and hundreds of rounds of ammunition while wearing a bulletproof vest and a mask?
14. Did the school have one or more security cameras? What do they show?
15. Why did a police officer specifically mention on radio that “they’re coming at me through this wood” followed by a fellow officer saying, “This is it”?
16. One officer at the school said, “We’ve got one suspect down.” Who was that? Down in this situation generally means in custody (on the ground and cuffed) not dead.
17. Why is Adam Lanza reported to be a loner when a teenager said (oxymoronically), “[Lanza and his friends] always gathered alone in a corner in school”?
18. Why are Ryan Lanza and his roommates still in custody, and why are the police pretending that it is for their own benefit?
19. Is it a coincidence that Nancy Lanza’s brother is Kingston Police Officer James Champion, who lives next door to the former Lanza home?
This is only a small percentage of the irregularities noted in what now seems to be more of a cover-up than investigation.
In truth, the public may well just be sick of hearing stories about “lone gunmen.” Of all possible horrors, this one, even more than the Benghazi killings, is loaded with political implication, not just “gun control,” but a clear attack on the security of every American family.
There are others including a Florida professor who are taking a serious look into this event. Claudine Zap writes;
A media professor at Florida Atlantic University who is questioning the Sandy Hook massacre has caused controversy with his conspiracy claims.
James Tracy, who writes a personal blog about conspiracy theories, believes the events that unfolded at Sandy Hook did not happen as reported.
The professor writes on his blog, Memory Hole, “While it sounds like an outrageous claim, one is left to inquire whether the Sandy Hook shooting ever took place—at least in the way law enforcement authorities and the nation’s news media have described.” He suggests that there were multiple shooters and that the number of dead is incorrect. The blog post was published on the Global Research site, where it caught the attention of the Web.
The academic, who is known for his conspiracy theories on 9/11 and the Oklahoma bombing, believes—as he claims on his blog and recently stated on a radio show—that trained “crisis actors” may have been employed by the Obama administration to shape public opinion on gun control.
The 47-year-old, who holds a Ph.D. from the University of Iowa in mass communication, wrote on his blog, “ As documents relating to the Sandy Hook shooting continue to be assessed and interpreted by independent researchers there is a growing awareness that the media coverage of the massacre of 26 children and adults was intended primarily for public consumption to further larger political ends.”
According to his faculty profile, the professor “teaches courses examining the relationship between commercial and alternative news media and socio-political issues and events.” He also lists his recent work in “Censored 2013: Sourcebook for the Media Revolution. The Top Censored Stories and Media Analysis of 2011-2012.”
Hey!!! Fellow conspiracy theorists made the news!!!!!! CNN’s Anderson Cooper – ‘Believe it or not, there are actually people out there who are convinced that last month’s horrific shooting in Newtown, Connecticut was staged. Anderson Cooper opened his show tonight taking on these conspiracy theorists. He said that ordinarily, he wouldn’t give much thought to insane conspiracies, but one of the people pushing them is a Florida professor who raises doubts as to whether the shooting “ever took place” in the way that the media described, and the whole thing was just a huge conspiracy to get the country behind gun control. And as if that wasn’t unbelievable enough, he also suspects that some of the parents of the children were really actors.
I’m presenting serious facts here Anderson and we the people, ya, many of us, millions, are asking serious questions that that the msm is clearly not. I understand part of your job description is “misinformation,” I get it, but we’re not buying it anymore.
There is an ever growing list of questions that we the citizens demand to be factually accounted for.
If the president goes through with his threat to circumvent Congress and issue executive orders, he is likely to face an expensive uphill legal battle – on the taxpayers’ dime. The very least you can do is present the real facts since we’re paying for it one way or another.
However the CNN page linked from the fundraiser that was posted four days prior to the shooting has an issue as the URL has been altered and the (day) date code is missing thus possibly signifying a covert operation to hide the actual dates posted of the following timeline, which reads like a play-by-play sports report (undated);
Woman claims she is mother of “Sandy Hook victim” who is alive and well.
Here is the post allegedly from the mother of Lily Gaubert who is incorrectly identified as Allison Wyatt. http://instagram.com/p/TS1VEhSC_U/
If you cursor over the photo, the post from the mother appears.
I find no MSM correction, and even more odd, I find no parent of Allison objecting to having the wrong photo posted of their daughter.
Newtown Police: ‘Two Occupants with Ski Masks, One May be Wearing a Nun Outfit’
Note: On December 14, 2012, Shepard Ambellas reported the following;
A caller on the Alex Jones show Friday (the day of the shooting) gave a report from Newtown that he was in a bowling alley before 10 AM (before the shootings took place) signifying that the school population was possibly held artificially low Friday as a possible militarized operation took place.
The caller has also stated that an unverified rumor is circulating amongst the school staff that the shooters were described to be disguised ”organized group of nuns”infiltrated the school property to carry out the shootings leaving at least 26 dead at an elementary school Friday.
Now evidence has come forth that correlates with school staff claims that the shooters were “disguised group of nuns” in a shocking audio capture of Newtown Police operations on the morning of the shooting.
NEWTOWN, CONECTICUT — It has now been verified in an audio clip reviewed bytheintelhub.com that, at the very least, police officers on the day of the shooting believed that there were multiple suspects fleeing the scene in a purple van wearing ski masks and, possibly, nun outfits.
UPDATE: January 9, 2013 — The following police audio (YouTube) has been pulled along with a plethora of other videos (in the last 24 hours) which show in a massive coordinated effort to fool the American people as the Sandy Hook shootings were likely staged.
On the very day of the shooting, the Chicago Tribune posted the following headline reading simply, “Elementary School Shooting”.
What kind of headline is this? What could this article be about? It sounds more like an optimized search engine term rather than an article headline on a popular mainstream newspapers website. But even more creepy was what the body of the article read and the photo it contained.
Two unidentified nuns leave the scene of the aftermath at Sandy Hook Elementary School in Newtown, Connecticut. At least 27 people, including 18 children, were killed.
It literally reads “Two unidentified nuns leave the scene…”. However what stands out to me the most is the fact that the nuns look very official. In fact they look so official they even have blatant identification badges.
( Don Emmert, Getty Images / December 14, 2012 )( Don Emmert, Getty Images / December 14, 2012 )
And of course we can’t forget about this brilliant performance!
The USA has been deliberately dumbed down our kids. Our educational system is not a failure; it has completely succeeded in achieving the goals it was designed to meet. Read Isserbt, “The Deliberate Dumbing Down of America.”
I write you about some intriguing material I have in my possession that was written by a key player in Gov.George Wallace’s campaigns.
As in any political conspiracy assassinations, some things are very difficult to prove, but there is a very strong chain of circumstantial evidence presented here.
These historic documents were written by Seymore Trammell, Campaign Finance Director and confidant to Governor George Wallace, including memos of then Attorney General John Mitchell and other primary sources. Trammell’s manuscript reveals how theDirector of Central Intelligence,George H. W. Bush, dispatched his son, W. Bush, as an undercover operative to spy on the Wallace campaign. References also include the whereabouts of Bush Jr. during the time he allegedly went AWOL between 1968-72.
After his release from MaxwellAir Force Base FederalPrison Camp, Trammell, historian Dr. Dan Carter, publishers Simon & Schuster, the IRS, Nixon’s Attorney General John Mitchell, Wallace, just to name few, were able to piece together the events that led up to the conspiracy and subsequent attempt to first assassinate Trammell on October of 1971 in Montgomery, Alabama, and Governor George Wallace on May 15th, 1972 in Laurel, Maryland at his Presidential campaign speech.
Seymore Trammell. Gov. George Wallace’s Campaign Director.
In 1958, Wallace ran in the Democratic primary for governor. Since 1901 and the state’s effective disfranchisement of blacks and many poor whites, the Democratic Party was virtually the only party in Alabama, and the party primary was the real competitive contest. This was a political crossroads for Wallace. State Representative George C. Hawkins of Gadsden ran, but Wallace’s main opponent was state attorney generalJohn Malcolm Patterson, who ran with the support of the Ku Klux Klan, an organization Wallace had spoken against. Wallace was endorsed by the NAACP. Wallace lost the nomination by over 34,400 votes.
After the election, Trammell recalled Wallace saying, “Seymore, you know why I lost that governor’s race? … I was outniggered by John Patterson. And I’ll tell you here and now, I will never be outniggered again.”
For the next ten years, Trammell — himself a hard-line segregationist — would aid and abet Wallace’s racist political strategy. He was one of Wallace’s most trusted aides until ego and corruption drove them apart.
Lurleen became Alabama’s first and only lady Governor.
At the time, Alabama’s state constitution prevented George Wallace from seeking a second term in 1966, a restriction that was eventually repealed, largely due to the work of his backers. However, the repeal of the term limit was not in time for Wallace himself to run that year.
Mrs. Wallace won the election in the fall of 1966, and was inaugurated in January, 1967.
Under Trammell’s direction and financing, Wallace had finished first in the 1962 Democratic primary ahead of State Senator Ryan DeGraffenried, Sr., taking 35 percent of the vote. In the runoff, Wallace won the nomination with 55 percent of the vote.
In 1968 Wallace and Trammell almost cost Richard Nixon the Presidential race. By early 1971, the Wallace Presidential train was still on track, getting more electoral votes and gaining more popularity from coast to coast. Wallace came close to throwing the race into the House of Representatives in 1968 by winning 46 electoral votes on the American Independent Party ticket. If he had carried a few more states in the Midwest, it could have resulted in the appointment of Hubert H. Humphrey as president and changed the course of history since the Democrats held a majority in the House.
Trammell and Wallace had become enemy number one for Nixon in ‘72 and he wanted to get Wallace out of the way, “by any means necessary.”
According to the Nixon White House tapes and historical accounts, Nixon was determined not to let Wallace threaten his chances for the Presidential bid.
An archivist who has listened to many hours of the Nixon tapes says it is clear that the president was deeply concerned about Wallace during the campaign and that there is a good bit of chatter about Wallace after the shooting. Housed in College Park, Maryland, some of the tapes are not the best quality and some conversations are hard to hear clearly. The tapes, indexed by subject but not transcribed, indicate evidence of direct involvement in the Wallace assassination attempt by Nixon and other key players. However, there are always the missing 18 and half minutes.
Nixon was not about get beat by an upstart ultra-conservative Southern politician nor was he negotiating for concessions in the South.
Richard Nixon had appointed Alabama billionaire and philanthropist, Winton ‘Red’ Blount as his Postmaster General from 1969 to 1971; Blount was one of the most influential persons in Alabama, shaping the state financially, educationally and politically. He also founded and served as the Chief Executive Officer of the large construction company, Blount International, based in Montgomery, Alabama.
From the The Montgomery Advertiser newspaper (found on microfilm) – ‘Nov.1st, 1971- Winton ‘Red’ Blount, Nixon’s Post Master General, announced on Saturday Oct.30th, “effective immediately” had “resigned” from Nixon’s Cabinet as Post Master General to come to Alabama to run for the U.S. Senate against the very popular incumbent, John Sparkman.” In the same paper, same date, I came across the article I had been looking for before I stumbled upon the news about Blount:
“Seymore Trammell had a severe auto accident over the weekend.”
Richard Nixon had appointed Alabama billionaire and philanthropist, Winton Red Blount as his Postmaster General from 1969 to 1971; Blount was one of the most influential persons in Alabama, shaping the state financially, educationally and politically. He also founded and served as the Chief Executive Officer of the large construction company, Blount International, based in Montgomery, Alabama.
Blount suddenly resigned and came to Alabama the same weekend Seymore had a ‘severe auto accident.’
From TheMontgomery Advertiser – “Trammell loses an eye in car “accident” and Blounts resigns as head of U.S.Post Master General
Nixon instructed Blount to resign the day they tried to assassinate Trammell! The timing is uncanny! Coincidence? ————–
In 1976 Ford brought Bush back to Washington to become Director of Central Intelligence (DCI), replacing William Colby. He served in this role for 357 days, from January 30, 1976, to January 20, 1977. The CIA had been rocked by a series of revelations, including those based on investigations by the Church Committeeregarding illegal and unauthorized activities by the CIA, and Bush was credited with helping to restore the agency’s morale. In his capacity as DCI, Bush gave national security briefings to Jimmy Carter both as a Presidential candidate and as President-elect, and discussed the possibility of remaining in that position in a Carter administration, but did not do so. He was succeeded by Deputy Director of Central Intelligence E. Henry Knoche, who served as acting Director of Central Intelligence until Stansfield Turner was confirmed.
Other positions (1977–81)
After a Democratic administration took power in 1977, Bush became chairman on the Executive Committee of the First International Bank in Houston. He later spent a year as a part-time professor of Administrative Science at Rice University‘s Jones School of Business beginning in 1978, the year it opened; Bush said of his time there, “I loved my brief time in the world of academia.” Between 1977 and 1979, he was a director of the Council on Foreign Relations foreign policy organization.
Bush Sr. had landed a token appointment from Nixon as Ambassador to the United Nations after a losing run for the U.S. Senate from Texas. Like any politician, he would have been interested in gaining “chits” with the president. What better way than to send his own son to Alabama to spy on the Wallace campaign, under the guise of helping Blount, an old family friend, with mutual connections to Saudi Arabia and Middle Eastern oil?
Dan Ratherrecalled the last conversation he had with George W. Bush after his controversial 2004 CBS News report on the former president’s Air National Guard service record.
“I was at the White House for a briefing for reporters, and I asked him a couple of questions and he answered the questions,” Rather said. “And then afterward he said to me, ‘I hope you’ll be happy retired in Austin.’ That’s my home. I had no intention of retiring in Austin. I have a passion for my work and I plunged myself back into doing work. But that’s the only conversation I’ve had with him since.”
“We reported a true story,”he said. “That’s why I’m no longer with CBS News.”
Logic and knowledge of hardball politics dictate the reason George W. came to Alabama and goes beyond working on Blount’s Senate campaign, and the National Guard transfer obtained to facilitate his move.
The plan involved a convenient, if after-the-fact, transfer out of the Guard in Texas, where G.W. at age 26, was reportedly “getting into trouble,” according to family friends and published accounts.
Bush Sr. dispatched W. as an under cover agent to spy on Wallace to gather information while working for the Blount campaign. W. made the move to Alabama in May to work for Blount for the U.S. Senate against the very popular Southern Democrat, John Sparkman. The lessons of that year were not lost on Bush nor his political adviser, Karl Rove, who was also cutting his political teeth.
Local conversations in and around Montgomery were that Bush Jr. spent his time dating local women and hanging out at the Wallace political gatherings.
To the casual observer, the young Bush presented himself as a pilot interested in local politics and a good time party guy. This was very common in Montgomery at that time.
Those who encountered Bush in Alabama remember him as an affable social drinker who acted younger than his 26 years. Sources say he also tended to show up late every day, around noon or one, at Blount’s campaign headquarters in Montgomery.
”Richard Nixon is a no-good lying bastard. He can lie out of both sides of his mouth at the same time, and if he ever caught himself telling the truth, he’d lie just to keep his hand in…[Nixon is] the easiest man to beat.” — Harry Truman, 1960
Nixon and his assassination team decided that Wallace must be stopped, “by any means necessary!” The plan was to kill Trammell first, which would send a significant message to Wallace by eliminating his Campaign and Finance Director.
The ‘Diplomat’ was a popular watering hole for politicians.
Trammell had been at a typical political gathering at the ‘Diplomat’ in Montgomery, Alabama. This is where all the state politicians would gather to discuss what they would do in the legislature, contracts and a host of other issues. While Trammell was socializing, Nixon’s team made their hit by drugging him with LSD; the ‘team’ had calculated the drug would be absorbed into Trammell’s system quickly and cause a ‘significant accident.’ (Note:Nixon’s plot to assassinate Jack Anderson by either putting poison in his medicine cabinet or exposing him to a ‘massive dose’ of LSD by smearing it on the steering wheel of his car.)Nixon plot against newspaper columnist detailed – politics.
It was John N. Mitchell, after being betrayed by Nixon, who confessed to Trammell, how Nixon had dispatched his ‘assassination team’ by orchestrating a near fatal auto crash in Oct. of 1971; Mitchell also confirmed ‘W.’ being dispatched as a political spy for daddy Bush and President Richard Nixon.
G.Gordon Liddy’s own memoirs on Watergate mention how the CIA drugged and killed people that were deemed a danger to “National Security.” Liddy admits to being in charge of Nixon’s dirty tricks squad in his book Will and provides the details of a plan to “get rid of” Nixon opponents, including columnist Jack Anderson. In 1971, Liddy joined the White House Staff. Working under Egil Krogh, Liddy became a member of the Special Investigations Group (SIG). The group was (informally known as ‘the Plumbers’ because their job was to stop leaks from Nixon’s administration).
G. Gordon Liddy, was the chief operative for the White House Plumbers unit that existed from July–September 1971, during Richard Nixon’s presidency.
Liddy was convicted for the Watergate burglary conspiracy and refusing to testify to the Senate committee investigating Watergate. He served nearly fifty-two months in federal prisons. Liddy helped extend the scope and reach of the White House ‘Plumbers’ unit, which had been created in response to various damaging leaks of information to the press.
Even though it almost cost him his life, Trammell thought the ‘Alabama Project’ was a masterful conspiracy between then President Richard Nixon, H.W. Bush, W. W. and other key players.
Trammell had been anxious to get home because he had a quarter horse in a race that same evening in LaFayette, Louisiana. He wanted to head home from the Diplomat to call his trainer, Jerry, to find out the results. Trammell had narrowly escaped death in a suspicious car crash that night but no one put the pieces together until later.
The only thing Trammell recalled before the crash was feeling dizzy, then he blacked out. The access road he had been traveling on turns very slightly to the left and then dead ends into a huge cement drainage culvert, somewhat guarded by an approximately 3 foot tall large mound of dirt.
Trammell’s Lincoln hit this mound of dirt at a speed of approximately 80 miles per hour, crashing into the cement culvert, throwing him onto the floorboard of the car, possibly saving his life, although he still sustained massive head and chest injuries, and the loss of an eye.
Seymore Trammell after his near fatal car accident
Trammell was rushed to Saint Margaret’s Hospital in downtown Montgomery. The next thing he remembered is being in an emergency operating room after Dr. Bruce Holding and other doctors brought him back to life with electric paddles. Trammell and the doctors that operated on him were able to rule out alcohol but were still left baffled by what could have caused the accident. No one realized at the time that Nixon had plotted an attempted political assassination. They didn’t learn until later that it was Nixon’s assassination team, the “Plumbers” who had planned and executed similar heinous crimes.
“One more thing I want to warn you boys about is a guy named Richard Nixon. You might not have heard much about him, but he’s fixin’ to be the next President and there’s not a damn thing anybody can do to stop him! I want to warn you to stay away from him because he will kill anybody to get elected and whatever he wants to do.” – Lyndon B. Johnson
Since Nixon’s plans had failed, his killer goon squad set their sight on Wallace which took 6 months of planning and resulted in recruiting, funding and training Arthur Bremer to shoot Wallace in Laurel, Maryland.
On May 15th, 1972, Wallace, with a full road crew in Laural, Maryland, came to speak at a Presidential rally. His former Press Secretary, Bill Jones, warned him it was a bad idea to step out into crowds, especially in dangerous areas like Maryland, and not to speak at this particular rally. Following his speech, against Bill’s advice, Wallace wandered out into the crowd to shake hands; Arthur Bremer, who had been following Wallace for several months, was in the crowd with a loaded .38 caliber revolver as instructed. While Wallace greeted his fans, Bremer walked up, getting within 3 feet of him, and shot four times. Wallace was taken to Holy Cross Hospital in Silver Spring where they were able to save him, leaving one bullet lodged in his spine that he eventually took to his grave. It also forced him to suffer in a wheel chair the rest of his life as a paraplegic.
Widely reported discrepancies, emerging at the time of the investigation, including the fact that Bremer’s finger and palm prints were not found on the gun, although he is shown on film without gloves, and, the bullets that entered Wallace showed trajectories from above and behind, in spite of Bremer firing all four shots from directly in front of Wallace.
The entire scene was captured by a CBS News camera crew, purportedly on a tip from the CIA to “be there that day.” The bullets struck three witnesses, two were removed and recovered, however, the bullets were so damaged that not one of them could be linked to Bremer’s gun.
Maryland police originally sent out a wanted message for a second man believed to be involved in the shooting, but later retracted it and said it was a mistake.
Sound familiar? Grassy knoll…
The 1972 shooting of presidential candidate George Wallace by Arthur Bremer in Maryland.
It’s uncanny how the camera crew focused on Bremer before the assassination attempt!
Trammell had split with the Wallace campaign after learning about the siphoning of $3.25 million from the presidential election fund by Gerald Wallace, George’s brother. Trammell wanted the money spent in the Midwest, where the campaign came close to picking up a number of states in the ’68 race. Gerald decided to take the siphoned money and put it into the Wallace family retirement. The money was then deposited in a bank in Clayton, Alabama, run by their good friend and banker, Tom Ventress.
Soon after, Seymore contacted by Blount in Washington, D.C. asking him to come to the Justice Department to discuss DOJ and IRS charges against the Wallace state and campaign operations. The entire Wallace family and all their political connections and contributors were being investigated, this was know as the ‘Alabama Project.’
Blount revealed to Trammell there was a very wide ranging investigation of the Wallace campaign with respect to Federal tax evasions and wrong doings in State Government elections.
Trammell was assured by Blount that he would have “complete immunity of prosecution if he cooperated.” In the end, Trammell’s immunity was taken away, and he was made to be the ‘scapegoat’ for this Alabama Project, also known as Nixon’s secret files of the IRS.
Seymore went to the Justice Department and gave them as much information as possible. Little did he know at the time, Nixon had already hatched his next dubious plan; as a result, Seymore was notified by the IRS of charges of Federal Income tax evasion. Wallace and his family were also notified of the same.
”It’s not enough for Nixon to win. He’s going to have to put some people in jail.”
— Lyndon B. Johnson, worrying about Nixon’s vindictive streak towards his political opponents, 1969
Since Nixon’s team failed to kill Trammell and Wallace, he was determined to put both of them in Federal Prison. It was at this time that Nixon decided to make a visit to Alabama with the ‘cover story’ to announce and praise a project in Mobile to expand the Tennessee-Tom Bigbee waterway for more commercial shipping traffic. Richard Nixon brought his daughter and Dwight Eisenhower’s grandson to complete the cover. Nixon knew from Blount that Wallace was deathly afraid of going to prison. Nixon wanted Wallace out of the picture so he made Wallace ‘an offer he could not refuse.’
He told Wallace to get out of the Independent Party and insisted on Wallace defaming McGovern and the Democrats or be prosecuted for federal income tax evasion and campaign violations. Naturally, Wallace took ‘the deal.’
Nixon’s threat to throw Wallace and his family in prison was successful. To assure Wallace and Trammell couldn’t get back together, Seymore was set up in a ‘fixed’ federal prison sentence. Federal Prosecutor Ira DeMent told Trammell his tax immunity had been taken away from him and he was headed for conviction.
As instructed, Wallace got into the Democratic Party and traveled the country maligning George McGovern and the Democrats. Seymore found himself in a fraudulent federal income tax trial while still recovering from his near fatal ‘accident.’ In the end, the famous racially integrating Federal Judge, Frank M. Johnson, was instructed by Nixon to charge Trammell with ‘conspiracy’ to commit Federal Income tax evasion of not paying some $3,000 in back taxes for a swimming pool. The pool installation company was forced to lie in order to get a conviction!
At the time, it was such a small thing and Seymore’s secretary had repeatedly told the pool company to send him a bill for the pool, but they never did, and treated it as a ‘political gift’ which Trammell was never aware of.
Bill Jones, former Press Secretary to Gov. George Wallace, and Trammell’s attorney, Robert M. Alton, III leaves court after testifying on behalf of his friend, Seymore Trammell, who financed the campaign in California in 1967 to qualify Gov. Wallace for the Presidential ballot.
Trammell’s tax trial dragged on and on until Judge Frank Johnson finally instructed the jury to find Trammell guilty. The jury thought he would only have to pay the $3,000 and that would be that, but Judge Johnson had been pressured by President Nixon to put Seymore in federal prison. Judge Johnson found Trammell guilty of ‘conspiracy’ and sentenced him to 4 years at the local Maxwell Federal Prison where he served 20 months.
Nixon, typically consumed with fear and paranoia, found some solace in having Trammell incarcerated so he could not assist the Wallace campaign or expose any information about the assassination attempts.
Still recovering from his life threatening wounds, Seymore set his sights on documenting the events that landed him in prison on bogus charges. With the help of his son, Warren, they secretly managed to get his manuscript out of the prison.
Every few days, Seymore was able to type 15 to 20 pages at a time. He instructed his son to bring a newspaper when he came to visit. Seymore would slip the typed pages in the newspaper for Warren to sneak out so the prison guards wouldn’t find them in his cell.
In those days it was illegal for an inmate to write about his case in prison. Had Nixon suspected his dirty campaign tactics were being documented, he would have both he and his son killed. There was plenty to worry about, but Seymore was determined.
Soon after Seymore was paroled, Nixon’s Attorney General, John Mitchell, was sentenced to 19 months for his role in the cover-up of the Watergate break-in; when he was released, next on the chopping block was Nixon’s inner circle guy, Charles Colson, who was sentenced to Maxwell for 18 months.
When John Mitchell was in Maxwell, he frequently called Seymore at home and exposed Nixon’s ‘Alabama Project’. Mitchell insisted he had nothing to do with the attempted assassination of neither him nor Wallace. Mitchell also confirmed Bush Sr. and George W. were co-conspirators in the plot to assassinate a State Governor and Presidential candidate, and his #1 adviser, Seymore Trammell, crimes we believe they should be indicted for.
Once Seymore was released from the Maxwell Federal Prison Camp, he was contacted by Dr. Dan T. Carter, one of the nation’s foremost historians on U.S. and Southern history.
Carter needed information on Wallace and his relationship with Richard Nixon. He knew the most reliable source for obtaining what he needed for his book was from the man responsible for the Governor’s success.
Trammell decided to work with Dr. Carter because he was a famous Southern Historian and history professor who had the necessary resources to publish his manuscript.
Seymore and his son met with Dr. Carter several times and agreed to give him a copy of the manuscript he had written while in prison. Seymore and Warren, spent numerous hours with Carter verifying Seymore’s extraordinary accounts of this important piece of history.
Carter had spent millions of dollars of his publisher, Simon & Schuster’s, money on lawyers to obtain the IRS files and necessary investigation into the ‘Alabama Project.’
Because of the incriminating nature of Trammell’s documents, Simon & Schuster would not allow this shocking piece of history to be included in Carter’s book, the ‘The Politics of Rage.’
Carter credited Trammell in his book, “Seymore Trammell, George Wallace’s most influential political adviser and state cabinet officer in the 1960′s, generously spent several days with me sharing his memories and his knowledge of those years. In all our extensive interviews, I never found an instance in which he misled me. He has his own fascinating story and I hope he will eventually have a chance to tell it.”
Source – The Politics of Rage page 559.
Seymore’s manuscript ‘Madness in the Magnolias,’ is a significant game-changer to the Watergate story. Carter, and others are still keeping these historic documents out of the public’s eye. Why?
Trammell and Carter knew Watergate was brilliantly crafted by the Nixon administration. It was far less painful for Nixon to step down as President than go to prison for attempting to assassinate a Presidential Candidate and his Campaign Director.
I have shared Trammell’s manuscript with numerous historians, publishers and authors in the hopes to finally get his story published.
Winner of Nine Emmys and the Edward R. Murrow Broadcasting Award WASHINGTON—Highly-acclaimed investigative reporter Mark Feldstein joins The George Washington University’s School of Media and Public Affairs (SMPA) as an associate professor this fall. Drawing on more than two decades of experience as a broadcast journalist and freelance writer, Feldstein will teach: “Broadcast News Reporting” and “Reporting and Writing the News.”
Feldstein also has uncovered new evidence that documents one of the more outrageous schemes of the Nixon presidency: a plot to assassinate Anderson by either putting poison in his medicine cabinet or exposing him to a “massive dose” of LSD by smearing it on the steering wheel of his car. While the aborted scheme to murder Anderson has been reported — and disputed — before, Feldstein found new corroboration: A confession before his death by ex-White House “plumber” Howard Hunt.
Dan Rather, worked his way up at CBS News from reporter to anchor and helmed CBS Evening News for more than two decades. He’s also reported for 60 Minutes and 48 Hours. Resigning from the network after a questionable story on President George W. Bush, Rather has worked as an anchor and managing editor on AXS TV and published a 2012 memoir.
Harvey Klehr, B.A., Franklin & Marshall College; Ph.D. (1971), University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill. Specialization: Political Theory, Twentieth Century Political Ideologies. He received the Emory Williams Teaching Award (1983), Emory University Scholar-Teacher of the Year (1995) and the Thomas Jefferson Award (1999). His current research interests center around American communism and Soviet espionage in America. His most recent publication is Spies: The Rise and Fall of the KGB in America. (Yale, 2009). He served on the National Council on the Humanities from 2005-2011. He was selected to give the Distinguished Faculty Lecture during Founders’ Week in 2012.
Luke A. Nichter is an Associate Professor of History at Texas A&M University – Central Texas, where he teaches courses in 20th century international history. He received his Ph.D. from Bowling Green State University following positions held in the U.S. House of Representatives, the British House of Commons, and fellowships at the London School of Economics and the University of Oxford. Luke is currently revising a book manuscript tentatively titled Richard Nixon and Europe: Confrontation and Cooperation, 1969-1975, which is based on multi-archival research in six countries. He has also written a book-length biography of George W. Bush, and is under contract to write biographies of Lyndon B. Johnson and Richard Nixon.
Luke is a former founding Executive Producer of C-SPAN’s American History TV and his work is periodically featured by TheNew York Times, The Washington Post, and the Associated Press. He is also a noted expert on the Nixon tapes as a result of his efforts to digitize the nearly 4,000 hours of recordings which he makes available as a public service at nixontapes.org.
Max Holland is a journalist, author, and the editor of Washington Decoded, an online newsletter from the nation’s capital that began publishing 11 March 2007. He is currently a contributing editor to The Nation and The Wilson Quarterly, and sits on the editorial advisory board of the International Journal of Intelligence and CounterIntelligence. As of 2004 he had had more than two decades of journalism experience; his articles have appeared in The Atlantic Monthly, American Heritage, The Washington Post, The New York Times, Los Angeles Times, The Boston Globe, The Baltimore Sun, Studies in Intelligence, the Journal of Cold War Studies, Reviews in American History, and online at History News Network.
Holland’s published books include: Leak: Why Mark Felt Became Deep Throat: Max Holland (University Press of Kansas, 2012); The Kennedy Assassination Tapes: The White House Conversations of Lyndon B. Johnson Regarding the Assassination, the Warren Commission, and the Aftermath (Knopf, 2004); The CEO Goes to Washington: Negotiating the Halls of Power (Whittle Direct Books, 1994); and When the Machine Stopped: A Cautionary Tale from Industrial America (Harvard Business School Press, 1989). In 2011, he was the lead consultant for a National Geographic Television documentary about the Kennedy assassination that premiered in November 2011, entitled JFK: The Lost Bullet. The findings of the documentary were summarized in The DeRonja-Holland Report
Greider, prominent political journalist and author, has been a reporter for more than 35 years for newspapers, magazines and television. Over the past two decades, he has persistently challenged mainstream thinking on economics. For 17 years Greider was the National Affairs Editor at Rolling Stone magazine, where his investigation of the defense establishment began. He is a former assistant managing editor at the Washington Post, where he worked for fifteen years as a national correspondent, editor and columnist. While at the Post, he broke the story of how David Stockman, Ronald Reagan’s budget director, grew disillusioned with supply-side economics and the budget deficits that policy caused, which still burden the American economy.
He is the author of the national bestsellers One World, Ready or Not, Secrets of the Temple and Who Will Tell The People. In the award-winning Secrets of the Temple, he offered a critique of the Federal Reserve system. Greider has also served as a correspondent for six Frontline documentaries on PBS, including “Return to Beirut,” which won an Emmy in 1985.
Greider’s most recent book is The Soul of Capitalism: Opening Paths to A Moral Economy. In it, he untangles the systemic mysteries of American capitalism, details its destructive collisions with society and demonstrates how people can achieve decisive influence to reform the system’s structure and operating values.
Between 1972 and 1976, Bob Woodward and Carl Bernstein emerged as two of the most famous journalists in America and became forever identified as the reporters who broke the biggest story in American politics. Beginning with the investigation of a “third-rate burglary” of the Democratic National Committee headquarters in the Watergate complex, Woodward and Bernstein uncovered a system of political “dirty tricks” and crimes that eventually led to indictments of forty White House and administration officials, and ultimately to the resignation of President Richard Nixon.
Naturally Woodward and Bernstein were at the top of my contact list but I have only been able to correspond through their agents and have yet to hear from them.
Professor Dan Carter teaches United States History and has a special interest in national 20th century politics and the post-Civil War American South. Dr. Carter has taught the US Since 1877 survey, the history of the New South, and courses on documentary films as well as the making of Southern culture. He has also taught graduate courses on 20th century US history and the post civil-war South. His publications include: Scottsboro: a Tragedy of the American South; When the War Was Over: the Failure of Self-Reconstruction in the South, 1865-1867; The Politics of Rage: George Wallace, the Origins of the New Conservatism, and the Transformation of American Politics, and From George Wallace to Newt Gingrich: Race in the Conservative Counterrevolution, 1963-1994.
Dr. Carter, Professor of Southern History and author of ‘The Politics of Rage,’ touted “as one of the finest political biographies,” was the obvious choice to contact since he had already spent three additional years and millions of dollars verifying Trammell’s story.
At long last, Dr Carter could finally tell the real story of Watergate. The story he wanted to base his book on, had Simone & Schuster allowed him to include Trammell’s manuscript.
The extraordinary ‘Watergate’ game-changer that could have changed political history, as we know it.
One can only speculate as to why Carter has refused to respond to the countless emails and phone calls I’ve sent him. Perhaps he signed a gag order with Simone & Schuster to never reveal the facts.
Or maybe, like Dan Rather, who was fired from CBS news for exposing the whereabouts of W. Bush at the time, Carter may have been worried about his career, or being ostracized for exposing the truth, or worse.
James L. Roark, Samuel Candler Dobbs Professor of American History, author (B.A., University of California-Davis, 1963; M.A., 1964; Ph.D., Stanford University, 1973); southern history American history.
Frank Rich, Writer-at-Large, writing monthly on politics and culture, and editing a special monthly section anchored by his essay. He is also a commentator on nymag.com, engaging in regular dialogues on the news of the week.
Asif always knew where he was going, having dreamed of becoming a filmmaker since his childhood. The road he chose to travel led him straight to the Columbia College Hollywood, where Asif started his film and television career. He is dedicated to making a difference in the world through the projects he chooses to participate in. Asif Akbar’s latest documentary, “The Terror Within”, is a prime example of using the media in a noble effort to expose and eliminate corruption, fraud, waste and abuse.
“I promised my father I would get his manuscript published.
He told me to tell the complete true story of the assassination attempts made on him and Governor Wallace.
He made me promise to clear his name from the false charges made against him. What was once ours was unfairly taken from me and my father by Richard Nixon, the Bushes and their gang of thieves and assassins! To this very day, our name is tainted in the state of Alabama. Just ask anyone.
I swore to my father I would expose the real reason Nixon stepped down as President, which is now historical record, and completely verified by Dr Carter’s investigation.
By the grace of God, after four decades of trying to get my fathers story told, investigative journalist, Lisa Elkins Goodman, came into my life. Because of her diligence and astounding commitment to reveal the truth, I know she will get Seymore’s manuscript published.
Lisa has gone where no other person, friend, family, author, historian or publisher has ever gone before to help me keep my promise to my father.”
Lisa Elkins Goodman – Investigative Journalist / Literary Agent / Polymath – emphasis on exposing corruption, rooting out scoundrels and advocating for judicial integrity. (See Profile)
With love and admiration, I want to thank Warren Trammell for entrusting me with Seymore’s manuscript without which this important missing piece of history would never have been revealed.
Conspiracy Chronicles Presents: “The Alabama Project” Nixon’s Plot to Kill McGovern and Trammel
Joe Joseph 12/16/12 Many thanks to Joe for helping us get our story out!
“The Alabama Project” Nixon’s Plot to Kill Gov. George Wallace and his Campaign Director, Seymore Trammell.
Joe Joseph, Tim Watts and John King welcome Lisa Elkins Goodman and Warren Trammell to the broadcast to discuss “The Alabama Project” Nixon’s plot to assassinate George Wallace and his Campaign Manager Seymour Trammell. This plot is yet another plot that involves… you guessed it! The Bush Family!
This is a fascinating piece of history that just further proves the nefarious nature of politics and power!
http://youtu.be/QDfPJUJUSK8THE MOTIVESRobert Holmes, the shooting suspect’s father, is a senior lead scientist with FICO, the American credit score company. He was scheduled to testify in the next few weeks before a US Senate panel that is investigating the largest bank fraud scandal in world history. This banking fraud threatens to destabilize and destroy the Western banking system.
Robert Holmes, father of Dark Knight “alleged” gunman, James Holmes.
Allegedly, Robert Holmes may have uncovered the true intent of the massive LIBOR banking fraud, but his “predictive algorithm model” also traced the trillions of “hidden”dollars to the exact bank accounts of the elite classes who stole it. In other words, Robert Holmes could NAME NAMES! Those names WOULD AWAKEN THE WORLD to the depth of government and corporate corruption which could include members of Congress, Wall Street, Federal Reserve and EU executives and could even include US Presidential candidates and the British Royal family.
These Robert Holmes/LIBOR testimony links have remained unconfirmed by mainstream sources. I will keep an eye on the wires to see if these allegations prove true. As always, it is up to the reader to decide what they believe about the issues.
The motives for the massacre are:
1) To silence whistelblower Robert Holmes whose son is now facing a possible death sentence
2) To influence the upcoming vote on the UN Global Small Arms Treaty which could result in gun confiscation and disarming world citizens. The UN treaty could override national sovereignty and give a license to federal governments to assert preemptive gun control powers over state regulatory powers.
THE REAL JAMES HOLMES
James Holmes grew up in a churchgoing family in a “Mayberry” style community. Neighbors describe “Jimmy” Holmes as quiet, shy, unassuming, smart, clean cut and “not dangerous”. His mother, Arlene, is a registered nurse. His father, Robert, is a FICO senior scientist.
In high school, James ran cross-country, played soccer and snow boarded. After graduating, he completed an internship at the Salk Institute and Miramar College’s biotechnology “boot camp.” He also worked as a camp counselor. James has no criminal or military history whatsoever.
James Holmes received the prestigious National Institutes of Health Neuroscience Training Grant at the University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus in Denver. The $26,000 stipend paid his tuition for the highly competitive neuroscience program. Billy Kromka who worked with James for three months last summer in the Medical lab, said, “There’s no way I thought he could have the capacity to commit an atrocity like this”.
JAMES HOLMES WAS KIDNAPPED
Two months prior to the theater massacre, James Holmes’ entire world was turned upside down. That’s when two “Black Op” hitmen, entered his life and unravelled it using a drug called “SCOPOLOMINE” – also known as the “The Devil’s Breath”.
Scopolomine or “The Devil’s Breath” is colorless, odorless and tasteless and can be easily dissolved in drinks or sprinkled on food. Victims become so docile, they have been known to help thieves rob their homes and empty their bank accounts. Women victims have been drugged repeatedly over days and gang-raped or rented out as prostitutes.
In a common scenario, a person is offered a drink laced with the substance and wakes up miles away, extremely groggy and with no memory of what happened. The victim soon discovers that they have handed over jewelry, money, car keys, and sometimes even made multiple bank withdrawals to their assailants.
Scopolamine completely blocks the formation of memories making it impossible for victims to ever identify their aggressors. Under hypnosis, people can normally recall what happened to them…but scopolamine induces amnesia because the memory was never recorded,” said Dr. Camilo Uribe, the world’s leading expert on the drug.The drug depresses the cerebrum and destroys the power of reasoning’. There is no power to think or reason.
This is what happened to James Holmes. He claims he has no memory of the massacre or what happened. An employee at the Arapahoe County Detention Center, where Holmes is in an isolation cell, told sources: “He claims he doesn’t know why he’s in jail. He asked, ‘Why am I here?’
June, 2011 – James Holmes enrolls in the neuroscience Ph.D program at the University of Colorado Denver.
May 21, 2012 – Two months before the massacre, James Holmes is befriended by BLACK OP HITMAN #1 who drugs him with scopolomine for the first time. The hitman takes the drugged Holmes back to Holmes apartment at 1690 Paris Street in Aurora. The hitman moves in with Holmes and stays undercover for 8 weeks. The hitman maintains Holmes in a drugged state and accesses his email and bank accounts.
May 22nd, 2012 – Hitman #1 buys a Glock pistol using James Holmes identification. Less than a week later, he upgrades to a shotgun. The following week, he buys an AR-15 rifle. Hitman #1 also purchases explosive materials and equipment to rig Holmes entire apartment with a complex series of booby traps.
June 7th, 2012 – James Holmes shows up on campus for an oral exam in a drugged fog and fails.
June 7th to July 2nd, 2012 – Using James Holmes email, Hitman #1 orders guns, rounds of amunition, magazine holders, combat vest, knife, mask etc. with expedited shipping costs through FEDEX and USPS. Holmes signs for the deliveries in a drugged state.
July 5th, 2012 – While James Holmes is drugged, Hitman #1 dyes Holmes’ hair red-orange and takes a photo of him. The hitman then creates a profile for James Holmes on the AdultFriendFinder adults-only website. When completing the profile for Holmes, the hitman doesn’t know that Holmes is 6’3″, so he mistakenly enters 6’0″.
The hitman uploads James Holmes photo (above). Only days before the massacre, the hitman makes an entry on the AdultFriendFinder website site. Pretending to be Holmes, he describes his penis as “short/average”. He uses the screen name “classicjimbo” with a message on top of the profile which reads, “Will you visit me in prison?”
July 18th, 2012 – Hitman #1 mails an incriminating notebook filled with gruesome sketches and details of the plans for the attack in the crowded theater. The notebook is in a package sent to a professor at the University of Colorado, where Holmes was a Ph.D. candidate until dropping out of school just prior to the killings. The package was delivered by the U.S. Postal Service on the Monday after the shootings which forced the evacuation of a campus building for 2 1/2 hours.
July 19th, 2012 – Hitman #1 drives the GETAWAY CAR to the theater and parks it at the side of the multiplex. He buys a Batman ‘The Dark Knight Rises’ movie ticket and enters Theater 9. He sits in the far right front theater seat near the emergency exit door. He receives and picks up a cell phone call from BLACK OP HITMAN #2, then gets up and goes over to the emergency exit door. A movie theater witness named Corbin Dates sees him talking on the cell phone and holding the exit door open with his foot. Hitman #1 jams the exit door ajar for Hitman #2.
Hitman #2 parks James Holmes’ white Hyundai Coupe outside the Theater 9 emergency exit door at the back of the multitplex. James Holmes is drugged and semi-conscious in the passenger seat next to him. Hitman #2 is wearing full protective combat gear. His guns, ammunition, gas can and mask are stashed in back of the car. He calls Hitman #1 on the cell phone and gets the “go ahead” signal.
Hitman #2 gets out of the white Hyundai, leaves the semi-conscious James Holmes (locked?) inside the car, then opens up the hatchback and arms himself with guns and amo. He straps on his gas mask, carries his weapons and gas cans into the theater through the exit door twenty minutes after the movie starts. Using the tactical manoevers of a trained commando, he throws a gas canister into the crowd and shoots one shot into the air. The shot scares people out of their seats making them easy targets.
Gunman #1 leaves the theater through the exit door and returns to the getaway car parked at the side of the multiplex.
For 90 seconds, Hitman #2 shoots hundreds of rounds of bullets into the crowd killing 12 people and wounding 58 others. He then turns and runs out the exit door, strips off his armour and leaves a trail of blood, guns and protective gear that lead to the white Hyundai where James Holmes is sitting in a drugged stupor.
The gunman continues wearing his gas mask to hide his identity from the eye of a rooftop security camera positioned at the corner of the multiplex. After passing under the security camera, Hitman #2 ditches the mask, turns the corner of the building, then ducks into the getaway car driven by Gunman #1. The Black Op hitmen speed away.
James Holmes is reportedly arrested at his car without resistance.
Why was the back rear window on James Holmes white Hyundai Coupe broken? Was he locked inside? Did the police have to break the window to gain access to him? The mainstream media didn’t report whether or not James was in the car when he was arrested or whether he was coherent.
ABC News circulated a false report about an incriminating statement made by James Holmes’ mother. Arlene Holmes. ABC reported that when they phoned Arlene Holmes and asked her about her son being a suspect in the shooting, she answered “You’ve got the right guy”. His mother has denied making that statement.
Take a look at Holmes’ mugshot photo next to the courtroom photo. What do you see?
Why does the mugshot show Holmes in the same emotional state as the courtroom photo? Because James Holmes mugshot wasn’t taken after his arrest which is standard procedure. The mugshot was taken right before he appeared in court 3 days later. His facial hair growth is the same in both photos.
Why did they take the mugshot on the same day as his court appearance instead of the day of his arrest?
Because James Holmes was too “drugged” when they found him to even stand up for the mugshot!
James Holmes has no memory whatsoever of the massacre or of the past two months of his life. That’s why he is asking, ‘Why am I here?’ He really doesn’t remember.
JAMES HOLMES – THE FIRST VICTIM
12 people were killed and 58 wounded. The official number of reported victims of the Batman shooting is 70. That number is wrong. There were 71 victims!
What effect has two months in a “scopolamine” stupor had on James Holmes physical, emotional and mental health?
What kind of a deal will his father work out with the bankster MAFIA to save his son from the death penalty?
Like 9/11, The Batman movie massacre was an inside “Black Op”. What is a a Black Op? It is a covert operation by a government, a government agency, or a military organization. The term is also used for activities by private companies or groups. A black operation typically involves a significant degree of deception and clandestine, illegal activities that are often outside of standard military protocol.
The ruling crime families of trillionaire royals and banksters are conscienceless. They don’t care who they have to deceive, abuse, rob or sacrifice to achieve their one world government New World Order agenda.
James Holmes is an innocent man. He was programmed by a US Government Agency to carry out there planned attack and frame him for there benefit. James Holmes has no recollection of this event just like Sirhan Sirhan who was imprisoned for the Assassination of Robert Kennedy. Both were Programmed to kill.
He studied Neuroscience in the Universtity of Colorado, and may have been involved in mind altering neuroscience research.
Why did eye witnesses report a second Gas Canister coming from another direction in the Theatre?
Why did he receive a phone call on his cell and walk to the exit?
Why was his car parked out the front yet he went to the Fire Exit too collect his weapons?
Why does James Holmes have no recollection of this event?
Why did it look like James Holmes was severely drugged up during the Hearing?
Why has the FBI refused to listen to eye witnesses accounts?
Why have eye witnesses video’s been removed from YouTube?
Why was there an Identical incident earlier that morning they called an Emergency Drill?
Why did he surrender so easily to the police?
Why, if his plan was just to kill people, why did he admitted to have bombs placed in his apartment?
How does a unemployed student get equipped with military gear worth $20,000?
Why has the judge presiding over the case has imposed a gag order preventing involved parties from publicly discussing the case?
Why has James Holmes not had a lie detector test?
Odd how his Father was about to bring some banks down with the power of Knowledge.
Too many questions and not enough answers. So the only answer to this is that a US Government Agency was involved and this is a False Flag event.
‘if he was hypnotized why would he get an account on adult friend finder and bluntly ask ” will you visit me in prison” he obviously must have known he was going to do something. Or why would Did they also hypnotize him to play puppets with his hands?… In my opinion I think it is all planned but maybe not hypnotism. Who knows?
This blog is to post the on-going work on the expose’ of theRichrd Nixon/George Bush Assassination Copspiracy to assassinate my father, Seymore Trammell in 1971 and Alabama Governor George Wallace in 1972 in Laurel, Maryland. Our current President George Bush, Jr. was also involved in this “family affair” because he was here in ’71 and ’72 to help Nixon and his father, Bush Sr., to keep track of Seymore Trammell and George Wallace for the WaterGate Assassination team. Seymore Trammell, my father, was Wallace’s #1 political advisor and finance person who then, was a millionaire and put money into the Wallace political machine. It gave Nixon so much trouble in his presidential election of 1968 and 1972, the Nixon/Bush team had to assassinate them to keep them from keeping Nixon & Bush out of the White House. This Blog is devoted to the expose’ of that assasination conspiracy, the gathering of info on it and then promoting the soon to be published book on the expose’ to be entitled “Madness in the Magnolias-The Nixon/Bush Assassination Plot”. If you have any info to share on this or comments on it, “bring it on”. Let’s expose the assassination mentality in the National Republican Party that’s part of the plan to keep working people like us from making a decent living and protesting the Republican assault on America’s middle class.
For more information please contact literary agent, Lisa Elkins at – firstname.lastname@example.org