Augmented Intelligence, Brain and Cognitive Sciences, BrainGate implant, Chemical Weapons Convention (CWC), Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (DARPA), Mind-Controlled Weapons, Nanotechnology, Neuropharmacology, Neuroscience, Trans-Cranial Electrical Stimulation, Weapons of the Mind
Military mind-control weapons and performance enhancement
New insights into the way the brain works and direct brain interfaces enabling weapons to be targeted and fired with just a thought.
Ever since Stone Age men discovered that knapping flint produced sharp stone edges that could be used in combat as well as for cooking and hunting, technological advances of all kinds have been adapted and adopted by the military. The opportunities provided by modern neuroscience are proving no exception, but their application in a military context is accompanied by complex practical and ethical considerations.
Advances in neuroscience offer the military mind-control weapons and performance enhancement
Mind-control weapons and extra-sensory enhanced warfare techniques are definitely not science fiction. With a recent Royal Society report on research in areas such as neuropharmacology, functional neuroimaging and neural interface systems creates a new breed of super soldiers
Military interest in neuroscience has two main goals: performance enhancement, i.e. improving the efficiency of one’s own forces, and performance degradation, i.e.
diminishing the performance of one’s enemy. Advances in neuroscience may
provide a number of applications for enhancement beyond improving the operational performance of military personnel, ranging from improved protocols for selection and training to advances in rehabilitation and treatment of post-traumatic stress disorder.
The degradation applications of neuroscience are, for the purposes of this report, focused on the development of new weapons, in particular the development of so-called ‘non-lethal’ weapons such as incapacitating chemical agents. These applications raise key scientific questions of feasibility and significant policy, legal and ethical issues at the domestic and international level.
Neuroscience, conflict and security
The report published by the Royal Society warns the neuroscience community to be aware of the military ramifications of its research, including mind-controlled weaponry
Neuroscience is one of the most rapidly advancing fields in medicine, with highly-detailed imaging offering new insights into the way the brain works and direct brain interfaces enabling weapons to be targeted and fired with just a thought. The technology is not speculative – just last year scientists unveiled an implant called BrainGate that enabled a woman who had lost the use of her limbs after a devastating stroke to control a robot arm using thought processes alone.
The report, “Neuroscience, Conflict and Security,” formed part of a series that examined the impact of neuroscience on society, dealing specifically with the potential application of advances in neuroscience to the armed forces and security personnel.
It was chaired by Professor Roderick Flower FRS, professor of biochemical pharmacology at the The William Harvey Research Institute – Queen Mary University of London, and brought together international experts to discuss new developments in the field and the laws and ethics that apply to their application in a military and civil context. According to Flower, it was the first time the Ministry of Defence (MoD) Defence Science and Technology Laboratory (Dstl) had worked with academia in neuroscience.
“The people we were in contact with there were the horizon scanning team whose job it is to look out for potential new applications of research,” Flower said. “We relied on what was publicly available, and while the US is extremely open about what its military does, the UK is not so open, and countries like Russia and China are a complete cipher.”
A key advance in neuroscience has been improvements in real-time neuroimaging, which can indicate in great detail which parts of the brain “light up” when undertaking certain activities. One of its applications could be to screen potential recruits for a specific role, for example to see if they are temperamentally suited to be a commander, pilot or diver.
“At the moment it’s very much a case of taking people on and subjecting them to high-stress exercises and choosing the ones who make it,” says Flower. “If subjected to imaging during assessment you could identify who has good risk-taking behavior, strategy and planning ability, or 3D analytical skills.”
Brain scanning for target identification
Brain scanning can speed up and improve target recognition or identify changes in surveillance satellite images by recognizing subconscious objective identification rather than an operator having to process and actively react.
“It has been discovered that when you show the brain different images, it spots the differences between them even though they may not reach conscious awareness,” says Flower. “Wearing a helmet like a hairnet can pick up a spike in brain activity which you can correlate to differences identified between two images, even if they were flashed up too quickly to process consciously.”
That potentially has the ability not only to speed up the process of target selection but also improve accuracy. It also reduces problems associated with fatigue, which is a big issue facing people whose job involves scanning images for a long time, especially in the dark, such as surveillance UAV operators.
Situational awareness solutions allow soldiers to make effective use of varied information in a battlefield context.
Technologies like the BrainGate implant have already shown that machinery can be controlled with the mind alone, and games manufacturers have already brought out low-cost helmet conntrollers than enable wearers to play by mind power alone. The obvious application for the military is mind-controlled weaponry and remotely-piloted aircraft, which could make operation and reactions far faster.
“If you couple that with your subconscious mind being much faster at dealing with information you can see a situation sometime in the future where you’re not thinking about flying the aircraft, but your subconscious is doing it without interfering in any way,” says Flower. “You would probably have a much better appreciation of an incoming threat and fire off a couple of missiles without having to consciously think.”
Another approach that can improve the way the brain works is known as transcranial electrical stimulation where electrodes attached to a 9V battery are clamped to the head. Control studies showed it can improve the rate at which things are learnt, and possibly result in better memory formation.
Drugs to stimulate troops and disable enemies
The report also examines evidence on how drugs improve the performance of certain military tasks. These drugs have shown to greatly increase focus and attention on a specific task. They also increase their ability to tolerate pain, recover from injuries, and remain physically able in challenging environments.
“It could help when flying a long mission where you may become fatigued and your attention begins to drift off,” says Flower. “It could also help you focus when you have a lot of information to process, like being a fighter pilot in a particularly tense situation when you’re trying to get a missile lock on a target while the aircraft and radio are bombarding you with information and you have to communicate back.”
One controversial subject the report touches on is that of neuropsychological-inspired chemical weapons, discussing the fact that although the international Chemical Weapons Convention (CWC) bans the use of chemical weapons on the battlefield, they are allowed for civil law-enforcement purposes.
“One of the problems is as far as anyone in our field can find, it’s not possible to find a totally safe drug that you could use,” says Flower, citing the example of the Moscow theatre siege in which 150 civilians died alongside their Chechen rebel captors.
“If you start spraying it around it affects children, women, men, pregnant women, old men, people taking other drugs, and people with heart disease. It won’t just be the 70kg healthy young men on which these drugs are tested.”
Like automated weaponry and battlefield robotics, these new techniques should require an overhaul of ethical guidelines, especially with regards to civilian casualties. Currently the last person who gave the order to fire is responsible, but if it came from the operator’s subconscious, the line becomes blurred.
With advances in neuroscience holding such great potential for military applications, Flower would like to see the MoD to work closer with academia. One approach would be to have a two-way intern exchange between the MoD and academia.
Neuroscience has ramifications for future warfare, and the scientific community must be more aware of the the dangers.
“It’s not rocket science, the research is all out there, and most of it gets published,” says Flower. “It’s just a question of being aware of it and able to pick up the ideas and exploit them before they read about it in Nature.”
- BRAIN Initiative
- Brain mapping
- Decade of the Mind
- Human Brain Project (EU)
- Outline of brain mapping
- Outline of the human brain